美国代写论文：侵权的四个要素

在： ,

美国代写论文：侵权的四个要素

商业中存在侵权的四个要素，这些要素将在下面讨论：
1.保护的责任：这个要素是关于保护另一方权利的责任（Aatiya，2000）。在这种情况下，彼得负责这个行为。在看到这个侵权的因素之后，彼得的公司负责仔细地装饰公寓，所以家庭的安全是不容置疑的。
2，行使谨慎的责任心：这一要素讨论了党要履行的责任。如果这个因素没有得到满足，这意味着党忽视了原则，忽视了标准（Aatiya，2000）。彼得斯公司是负责任的，因为他的雇员离开了电线，这是一个疏忽大意的行为。

美国代写论文：侵权的四个要素
3.近因：这一因素解释了一方进行违约的义务与遭受损害的一方之间的联系（Aatiya，2000）。在这种情况下，张先生和彼得斯公司之间存在着联系，因为彼得负责装修公寓，由于他的员工疏忽，张先生得到了这种伤害
4.实际受伤：这一要素讨论了确认实际伤害的必要是身体的还是精神的。如果这种伤害存在，就意味着当事人是疏忽大意的，他们需要偿还对方的损失（Aatiya，2000）。在这种情况下，张先生受了重伤，他感到震惊。彼得斯公司负责赔偿医院和其他事情的损失。

美国代写论文：侵权的四个要素

There are four elements of tort present in business and these elements will be discussed under:
1.Duty to protect: this element is about the responsibility of the party to protect the rights of other party (Aatiya, 2000). In this situation, Peter was responsible for the act. After looking at this element of tort, peter’s firm was responsible for decorating the flat carefully so security of family could not be challenged.
2.Ailing for exercising a duty of care: this element discus about the responsible duty that needs to be performed by the party. If this element is not fulfilled it means the party has ignored the principles and ignored the standards (Aatiya, 2000). Peters firm is responsible because his employee left the wire open and it was a negligent act.

美国代写论文：侵权的四个要素
3.Proximate cause: this element explains about the connection between the duty of breach conducted by one party and the party that faced damage (Aatiya, 2000). In this situation a connection is present between Mr. Chang and Peters firm because peter was responsible for decorating the flats and due to his employee negligence, Mr. Chang got this injury
4.Actual injury: this element discusses about the confirmation of actual injury that needs to be physical or mental. If this injury is present, it means the party was negligent and they need to repay the damages of other party (Aatiya, 2000). In this situation, Mr. Chang was severely injured and he had a shock. Peters firm is liable for paying the damages of hospital and other things.

美国论文代写：责任划分

在： ,

美国论文代写：责任划分

双方需要在外科医生，病人等疏忽案件中，或者涉及道路交通事故案件的陌生人或司机中相互认识。当发生损害时，第一个问题是关于双方之间的关系。他们之间的关系需要存在;一个人不可能因为损害住在世界其他角落的个人而承担责任。如果一方主张损害赔偿，并且被认定为过失责任，那么基本问题就是关系。

美国论文代写：责任划分
这种关系是关心的责任。即使病人是陌生人，医生也要照顾病人，医生会尽职尽责。例如：马克在街上快速行驶时，如果明确表示是为走路的人，如果有人在开车，他们就不应该用电话交谈，慢慢开车。约翰被马克的车撞倒了。现在，责任的本质就是马克的疏忽，即使他知道他关掉手机慢慢开车的责任。通过这种方式，两人都是陌生人，但关系的发展是基于谨慎的义务（Giliker，2012）。在Dwaine的情况下，他正在执行一个故意的侵权行为，他知道后果。根据法律，他负责为客户提供最优质的服务。如果家庭搬进来，孩子吞下油漆片，那么孩子的健康就会出现严重的问题。 Dwaine将对此造成严重的损失，他将不得不依法向家属支付赔偿金。

美国论文代写：责任划分

Parties need to know each other in the negligence cases like surgeon and patient, or strangers or drivers that are involved in road accident cases. When the damage has been occurred the first question asked is about the relationship between the parties. Relationship needs to be present between them; it is not possible that a person is held liable for damaging the individual living in other corner of the world. If one party has claimed about the damages and is termed under the liability in negligence, the basic question is about the relationship.

美国论文代写：责任划分
This relationship is about the duty of care. Duty of care of the doctor with his patient even when the patient is a stranger, doctor will fulfill his duty. Example: Mark is driving fast on the street when it is clearly stated that it is for the people who walk and if someone is driving, they should not talk on the phone and drive slowly. John got hit by the car of Mark. Now the nature of liability is about the negligence of Mark even when he knew about his duty to switch off the cell phone and drive slowly. In this way both were strangers but the relationship was developed was based on the duty of care (Giliker, 2012). In case of Dwaine he is performing a tort that is willful and he knows about the consequences. According to the law he is responsible for giving the best quality services to the client. If the family moves in and the child swallows the paint flakes then serious problems can occur regarding the health of the child. Dwaine will be greatly responsible for this damage and he will have to pay the damages to the family according to the law.

美国论文代写：反托拉斯法案

在： ,

美国论文代写：反托拉斯法案

案例：2012年，友达光电因违反谢尔曼反托拉斯法而被定罪。根据摩托罗拉的说法，它已经从友达光电（AU Optronics）那里购买了价值50亿美元的部件，其中1％直接运到美国，57％运到其他国家，42％去了国外工厂，把这些部件放在平板电脑和手机中将在美国销售。

美国论文代写：反托拉斯法案
分析：美国的消费者一直通过反托拉斯法来保护公司的垄断和卡特尔。但是有一些外国公司为美国的手机公司提供了关键部件。摩托罗拉移动使用的一些主要组件由台湾的友达光电提供。早些时候，有人认为美国反托拉斯法不能适用于在美国以外的公司，即使这些部件制成的成品稍后在美国市场出售。问题是，如果美国不是外国公司出售零部件的直接买方，反垄断法就不能使用。据我所知，法院的判决部分是反对反托拉斯法，因为只要反托拉斯法案对美国商业没有任何直接的，实质性的，合理的可预见的影响，就可以作出反托拉斯法的判决。这是外国制造商直接向美国市场出售零部件并定价的直接信号。

美国论文代写：反托拉斯法案

The case: In 2012 AU Optronics was convicted for the violation of Sherman Antitrust laws. According to Motorola, it had bought components worth 5 billion dollars from AU Optronics out of which 1% was shipped directly to America, 57% was shipped to other countries and 42% went to foreign factories which put those components in tablets and cell phones which were to be sold in America.

美国论文代写：反托拉斯法案
Analysis: Consumers in America have always been safeguarded against the monopolies and cartels of the companies through the antitrust laws. But there are certain foreign firms supplying critical components to the cell phone companies in America. Some of the major components used by Motorola Mobility are supplied by Taiwan based company AU Optronics. Earlier, it was claimed that the American Antitrust laws cannot be applied to the companies working outside America even if the finished product made out of those components is sold in the American market later. The point was that antitrust law cannot be used in cases where the United States is not the direct buyer of the components sold by foreign companies. According to me the court’s verdict was partly against the antitrust law since it allowed antitrust cases as long it was not having any direct, substantial and reasonable foreseeable effect on American commerce. This was a direct signal for the foreign manufacturers to come together and fix prices as long as they are not selling the components directly to the American market.

美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革

在： ,

美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革

越南利用大量的资源来改革宪法和法律，支撑“社会主义市场经济”。这些过程的进行通常是临时性的，没有什么与战略和经验证据相关的证据显示系统用户需要什么。这导致了一系列法律和司法领域，其中一些机构和法律看起来很脆弱，与商业实践毫无关系。越南与官僚机构有关的部门正在继续运作，几乎不受法治和问责制原则的阻碍，这一原则一直给刚刚起步的商业界带来巨大问题。这就是越南“政治”，“行政”，“司法”，“法律”等相关定义的提出，需要修改和完善与“社会主义法治国家”有关的观念从单纯的修辞到现实。这也是为了抓住商机和社会提供的机会（Soo and Wong，2012）。

美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革
在菲律宾，宪法是在1987年制定的，体现了支持意识形态联盟推翻马科斯并使科拉松·阿基诺上台的议程。其宪法的政治纲领是通过选举机构来恢复民主，并通过自由的宪法维护人民的权利。菲律宾的经济计划正在为穷人提供管理私有财产的自然统治措施在社会正义标题和保护主义品牌（Shepherd＆Wilson 2008）的民族主义下防止对外贸易和工业的控制。这些想法反复地将在未来二十年中被背叛。

美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革

Vietnam has used a significant number of resources to reform its constitution and laws in underpinning the “socialist-oriented market economy”. The proceeding of the processes has often been ad hoc with little evidence related to the strategy and empirical evidences what is needed by the users of the system. This results in a universe of legal and judicial where a number of agencies and laws looks vulnerable with little relevance to the practice of business. There have been Vietnamese sectors related to the bureaucracy that is continuing its operations almost unhindered by the rule of law and accountability principles that has been causing tremendous problems for the fledging business community. This is suggesting of the definitions related to the “political”, “administrative”, “judicial” and “legal”in Vietnam with a need to revise and refine in transforming the idea related to the“socialist rule of law state” from a mere rhetoric to reality. This is also telling the allowance of the businessman and the society at large in seizing the opportunity it provides (Soo and Wong 2012).

美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革
In Philippines, the constitution was framed in 1987, embodying the agenda that supports ideological coalition ousting the Marcos and bringing Corazon Aquino to power. The political program of its constitution was restoring the democracy with the elective bodies and preserving the rights of its people through a constitution that is liberal in nature.The economic program of Philipinnes was ministering the poor with measures of statist in nature that regulates the private property the prevent the foreign control over trade and industry under the social justice rubric and the nationalism of the protectionist brand (Shepherd & Wilson 2008). These ideas, repeatedly, will be betrayed over the next twenty years.