美国代写assignment：不当影响

在： , ,

美国代写assignment：不当影响
这种分类涵盖了上面没有特殊关系的情况。然而，这种关系主要是基于“信任和确定性”，在这种情况下，一方当事人正在推动另一方的不当影响。在Etridge之后，在这种情况下不会有任何不适当的影响的假设。请愿人必须证明他们信任和信任被告;一旦创建，那么每当发生“需要澄清”的交易时，就会出现一个证据证明发生了不当影响的事实。答辩人将证明没有这样的影响。

美国代写assignment：不当影响
因此，无论这种关系是否属于例外关系之一，这种不适当的影响也可能同样适用。但是，一方以确定性的动机由另一方较弱的另一方支配，有能力获得这种影响的不公平的优势。以1975年劳埃德银行（Lloyds Bank Limited v Bundy）为例，一位老年农场主向世行提供了一笔保险金，用于支付其子女的透支，并将该大厦抵押给世行作为安全措施。显然，农业专家把自己完全交到了合作银行董事手中，没有机会寻找免费的律师。尽管通常情况下，不正当影响的假设不会对银行和客户产生任何重大影响，但Plea法庭却拘留了它，因此，在这种情况下，交易被搁置了。

美国代写assignment：不当影响

This classification covers situations where there is no exceptional relationship as clarified above; however, the relationship is mainly based on “trust and certainty” where one of the parties is in a situation to push undue influence over the other. Taking after Etridge there is no more any assumption of undue influence that occurs in such cases. The petitioner must demonstrate they put confidence and trust in the respondent; once that is created, then, whenever there takes place a transaction “requiring a clarification” an evidential assumption that undue influence has taken place will emerge. It will be for the respondent to demonstrate that no such sort of influence was worked out.

美国代写assignment：不当影响
Therefore, an induction of undue influence might likewise apply regardless of the fact that the relationship is not among one of the exceptional relationships. However, one party, by motive of the certainty rested in him or her by the other party who will be weaker, has the capacity to gain an unfair advantage of this influence. Case in point, in 1975 in Lloyds Bank Limited v Bundy, an elderly rancher offered the Bank an insurance in appreciation of his child’s overdraft and also mortgaged the mansion to the Bank as a safety measure. It was apparent that the agriculturist had put himself totally in the hands of the collaborator bank director and had been given no chance to look for free counsel. In spite of the fact that, ordinarily, the assumption of undue influence would not have any significant impact between the bank and the client, the Court of Plea detained that it did, so, here in this case the transactions were put aside.

美国代写essay：公司法

在： ,

美国代写essay：公司法

本文的目的来自新西兰一家航空公司的虚构情况。通过对澳大利亚公司法律的审查和适用，试图就澳大利亚飞行员协会所涉及的所有法律问题向澳大利亚飞行员协会提出建议。本文首先尝试审查在整个英联邦重要的2001年公司法。如果不仔细阅读2009年“公平工作法”，本文的立法领域将是不完整的。在澳大利亚的公司法先例的帮助下，将对这些立法在案件复杂性方面提出的限制进行审查和阐明。然后将提出一个合理的法律途径，引用所讨论的立法和司法文书提供的选择。

美国代写essay：公司法
介绍：
“2001年公司法”的规定在分析这一案件方面非常重要。该法历史上首次阐明雇主与雇员关系的指导原则。除此之外，由于其立法和司法先例的非限制性，破产作为替代责任一直是澳大利亚判例的一个突出方面。
澳大利亚飞行员协会是本文件所建议的案件的当事方，它保护成员的权利。这些权利来源于企业对其成员的责任，问题是案例历史中提到的两个商业实体中的哪一个可以被视为企业。因此，2001年的“公司法”有助于消除破产法的固有含糊性。

美国代写essay：公司法

The objective of this paper derives from a fictional situation set in an airline company in New Zealand. By attempting a review and application of Australia’s company laws, it seeks to advise the Australian Pilots Association on all legal matters related to the issue at hand. The paper first attempts a review of the Corporations Act 2001, which is significant throughout the Commonwealth. The legislative domain of this paper would be incomplete without a perusal of the Fair Work Act 2009. The limitations offered by these legislations in the context of the complexity of the case will be examined and elucidated with the aid of Company Law precedents in Australia. A plausible legal recourse will then be presented citing options offered by both legislative and judicial instruments discussed.

美国代写essay：公司法
Introduction:
The provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 are very significant in analysing this case. The Act was historically the first of its kind to elucidate on the directive principles of the relationships between employers and employees. In addition to this, insolvency as a vicarious liability has been a prominent aspect of Australian jurisprudence, owing to the non-restrictive nature of its legislations and judicial precedents.
The party to the case that is being advised in this paper is the Australian Pilots Association, which safeguards the rights of its members. These rights derive from the responsibility of the enterprise towards its members, the question being which of the two business entities mentioned in the case history can be considered the enterprise. The Corporations Act of 2001 was thus, instrumental in eliminating the inherent ambiguity of insolvency legislation.