代写：现代建筑及设计研究

在： ,

代写：现代建筑及设计研究

现代建筑是在一个世纪的工业化之后才出现的，并且从那以后逐渐发展成更加现代的形式，强调空间的形式和功能。现代建筑以简单为基础，结合材料的工程和技术进步，将其塑造成设计结构，使其与环境融为一体，并通过在设计中融入特征来对其进行补充。现代建筑是值得研究的，因为它本身就是所有设计思想的未来和基础设施和景观的起源，这将被要求奖励材料的使用。当设计是在现代设计构成的背景下进行研究时，它会让读者了解现代设计的基本理论和原则，这些基本理论或多或少是不断变化的，取决于项目的需求。

代写：现代建筑及设计研究

关于现代建筑和建筑设计的构成有很多文献，这些文献对环境无害，并将自然融入到设计中，以减少对资源的重视。流行的解释形成了现代建筑的理论，它是自然的增强，环境友好，遵循设计的功能，视觉上独特，是持久的，并且有最大的效率作为其主要的设计目的。然而,长期忽视对邀请突然和迅速变化的不确定性设计因素,当底层理论不是在所有情况下utilisable并显示急剧变化材料的使用,在设计上妥协,等什么可能适合一个建筑在日本可能不适合同一目的在巴黎或纽约,这些设计因素的差异是现代建筑理论的基础，适用于当前和未来的概念设计。

代写：现代建筑及设计研究

Modern architecture has had its emergence since a century of industrialization and has been growing ever since into more modern forms stressing on form and function of space. Modern architecture forms the use of simplicity clubbed with the engineering and technological advances of materials and moulding them into the design structure to allow it to be one with the environment and complement it by infusing the features into the design. Modern architecture is worth investigating, since it holds within itself the future of all design ideas and origin of the infrastructure and landscape, which will be required to reward the use of materials. When the design is studied in the context of what constitutes the modern designs, it gives an idea to the reader about the underlying theories and principles of modern designs that are more or less constant or changing depending on the demands of the project.

代写：现代建筑及设计研究
There have been several literatures about what constitutes modern architecture and constructing designs, which are not environmentally harmful and blend the nature into the design to put less stress on the resources. Popular interpretation forms the theory of modern architecture that it is nature enhancing, environmentally friendly, follows the functionality of design, is visually unique, is long lasting, and has maximum efficiency as its prime design purpose. However, there has been a long neglect about the uncertainties that invites sudden and rapid changes in design factors, when the underlying theory is not utilisable in all circumstances and displays a sharp variance in the use of materials, compromise on designs, etc. What may be suitable for a building in Japan may not fit the same purpose in Paris or New York, etc. This variance of design factors is fundamental to the modern architecture theory and applies to the current as well as the future conceptual designs.

代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护

在： ,

代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护

知识产权和专利保护有助于保护创新者的权利，并有助于开发产品独特的销售主张(Shay, 2014)。这是基于适当性因素的概念(Bittlingmayer, 1988)。适宜性因素是指创新者从创新中获利的能力。法律规定的先例通常让公众感到困惑。应该使用正确的原则对其进行上下文化和解释。像Michael Baigent和Richard Leigh v. The Random House Group Limited这样的案例已经改变了历史事实用于小说写作的方式(Shay, 2014)。1893年，家乐氏诉国家饼干公司开创了可以申请专利的先例(Pollack, 1999)。在此基础上，企业根据法律要求制定战略。这样的案例会影响公司未来的战略，也会影响公司未来的决策。每一个案例都需要基于以前的案例和案例的立法进行主观解释。为了进一步分析专利申请方面的问题，本文以Apimed Medical Honey Ltd v Brightwake Ltd[2012]为例进行分析。

代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护

提出了相关的法律和双方的观点。专利法是由1977年的专利法案规定的。人们发现，1949年的《专利法》所作的许多决定仍然具有现实意义。英国也是欧洲专利公约的成员国之一。因此，这些公约下的规则在形成判例时也具有相关性(Waelde et al.， 2013)。专利一般被发现是有领地性的，授予期为20年(Aplin，和Davis, 2013)。可利用性是创新者利用其为经济目的而设计的设计的权利(秋山，和Furukawa, 2009)。它受两个因素控制，即可保护性和可自由操作的条件。保护因素是公司能够维护和保护设计的研发者(秋山，和Furukawa, 2009)的所有权水平。自由经营条款是指公司在不侵犯他人权利的情况下经营的程度。这可以通过正式的方法或非正式的方法来完成(Somaya, 2012)。正式的方法是获取专利。

代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护

Intellectual property Rights and Patenting has helped protect the innovator rights and has aided in the development of the unique selling proposition of the products (Shay, 2014). This is based on the notions of appropriability factor (Bittlingmayer, 1988). Appropriability factor is the ability of the innovator to make profits from their innovation. Precedent set by the laws are generally confusing to the public. It should be contextualized and interpreted using the right principles. Cases like Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh v. The Random House Group Limited has changed the ways in which historical facts can be used for writing of novels (Shay, 2014). In 1893, Kellogg co. V. National Biscuit Co has set the precedent as to what can be patented (Pollack, 1999). Based on this, the firms develop strategy based on the legal requirements. Cases like these affect the future strategies of the firm and also impact the way decisions are made in the future. Each case requires subjective interpretation based on the previous cases and the legislations of the cases. To further analyze the aspects of patenting, the case of Apimed Medical Honey Ltd v Brightwake Ltd [2012] has been used in this analysis.

代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护
The relevant laws and the views of both sides of the argument are presented. Patent law is regulated by the Patents Act of 1977. It has been found that many of the decisions made in Patent Act of 1949 continues to hold relevance. UK is also a member of the European Patent convention. Hence, the rules under those conventions also hold relevance whilst forming judgment of the cases (Waelde et al., 2013). Patents are in general found to be territorial and is awarded for a period of 20 years (Aplin, and Davis, 2013). Appropriability is the right of the innovator to use the design created by them for the purpose of economics (Akiyama, and Furukawa, 2009). It is governed by two factors they are protectability and Free to Operate conditions. Protectability factor is the level of ownership that a company can maintain and protect the R&D of the design from the innovators (Akiyama, and Furukawa, 2009). Free to operate clause is the degree by which a company can operate without infringing on the rights others. This can be done through formalized methods or informal methods (Somaya, 2012). Formalized methods are procuring patents.