論文格式：利益相關者的責任

在： ,

論文格式：利益相關者的責任
一個組織為了更好地了解自己的職責，承擔了企業社會責任報告的過程。這個過程包括各種成員，包括受組織運營影響的利益相關者(Crane, 2012, p.69)。 “利害關係”意味著個人在組織及其執行操作中擁有股份和利益。利益相關者包括員工、客戶和董事會、所有者、股東、政府機構、工會組織、媒體和其他。這些利益相關者通過他們的具體權利，幫助一個組織通過遵守社會法律獲得利潤，並通過有效的解決方案緩解其問題。在廣泛的範圍內，這些涉眾可以分為主要和次要兩類。主要的利益相關者是那些對組織的績效和業務有興趣的人。他們是參與組織成敗的員工、董事會、所有者和股東(Smith, 2003, p.55)。另一方面，二級利益相關者在組織的運作中起著積極和消極的作用。它們通過不斷的努力幫助實現組織所設定的目標。次要利益相關者的例子包括政府機構、工會團體、媒體、社會和政治團體等。利益相關者有一定的責任。 :可自由支配的責任,這個項目的目標組織提高個人和社會的福利。
在這裡，利益相關者的最終願望是成為一個企業公民。道德責任,這包括利益相關者的責任,以確保組織是否公平平等的成就目標。這需要遵守道德和社會規範(施瓦茨&卡羅爾，2003年第510頁)。法律責任,這下,利益相關者將有效地執行其業務通過遵守政府制定的法律規範。經濟責任,利益相關者可以執行他們的任務,協助組織通過可行的、經濟的方法。這樣，組織才能有效地滿足顧客和整個社會的需要。另一個受組織行為影響的群體是股東。它們在使本組織財政的現值最大化方面發揮著關鍵作用。滿足股東的需求可以創造財富，從而改善社會。它們在為可持續報告提供決議方面發揮關鍵作用，可持續報告是對本組織所面臨挑戰的一種解決辦法(Smith, 2003, p.63)。這些股東通過評估組織的績效(包括風險和挑戰)來處理組織的業務模型和治理策略。它們還在加強它們與各組織之間的聯繫方面發揮重要作用，從而協助實現各項目標。

論文格式：利益相關者的責任

An organization, in order to have a greater understanding of their responsibilities, undertakes the process of CSR reporting. This process includes various members including the stakeholders who are affected by the operations of the organization (Crane, 2012, p.69). A “stake” implies that an individual has a share and interest in an organization and its execution of the operations. The stakeholders include the employees, customers, and the board of directors, owners, shareholders, government agencies, union groups, media, and others. These stakeholders through their specific rights and assist an organization to gain a profit through the adherence of the social law and alleviates its problem through an effective solution. Within a broad spectrum, these stakeholders can be classified into primary and secondary groups. The primary stakeholders are the one who have an interest in the performance and the business of an organization. They are the employees, board of directors, owners, shareholders who are involved in the success and failure of the organization (Smith, 2003, p.55). On the other hand, the secondary stakeholders are the one who play an important part in the operations of the organizations both positively and negatively. They assist in the achievement of the goals set by an organization through continuous efforts. The examples of secondary stakeholders include the government agencies, union groups, and media, social and political groups etc. The stakeholders have certain responsibilities. They are:Discretionary responsibility，This projects the goal of the organizations to improve the welfare of the individuals and the society as a whole.
Here the ultimate desire of the stakeholders is to be a corporate citizen. Ethical Responsibility，This consists of the responsibility of the stakeholders to ensure whether the organizations are fairly equal in its achievements of the goals and objectives. This requires the adherence to the ethical and social norms (Schwartz & Carroll, 2003 p.510). Legal Responsibility，Under this, the stakeholders are expected to efficiently execute their operations through the adherence to the legal norms set by the government. Economic Responsibility，The stakeholders can carry out their task to assist the organizations by being feasible and economical in their approach. In this way, the organizations can cater to the needs of its customers and society as a whole in an efficient way. Another group who are affected by the actions of an organization is the shareholder. They play a key role in maximizing the present value of finance of the organization. Abiding by the needs of the shareholders generates wealth that acts as a betterment of the society. They play a key role in providing resolutions to sustainable reporting, which acts as an address to the challenges faced by the organization (Smith, 2003, p.63). These shareholders address an organization’s business model and the governance policies through an assessment of the performance of the organization including risk and challenges. They also play a vital role in strengthening the bonds between them and the organizations and as a result, assist in the achievement of the goals.

代写assignment之高分写作技巧

在： ,

代写assignment之高分写作技巧

由于老师们对一篇assignment的理解和看法不同，所以他们对assignment的写作和要求的标准也不一样，但是大致的评分标准都是差不多的，相信留学生们都非常清楚这一点，所以留学生们只要认准这个标准基本及没什么问题了，下面是我们网站代写assignment的老师多年总结的assignment高分写作技巧，希望对留学生们有帮助。

1、语言

在一篇文章中，英国环球论文老师想告诉大家，语言文字的使用不仅仅是你在全篇所使用的词语，还包括句子结构、文体选择、不同的形式、语法、用法、文字处理等。一篇好的文章中好的语言文字只能说是必备的，是基本的要求。可能你的整篇语言没有什么明显的问题，但也可能没有什么新意了。好的文章语言意味着你使用了不同种类的句子结构。例如，你可能会将一些简单句和复合句结合起来使用。你的文章形式和语气也要适合整篇文章，而不是一味使用自己熟悉的语言和俚语。比如说，当你在班里写一篇研究报告时，好的语言不会干扰到你的论点。如果你对一篇好文章满意，那么这篇文章肯定能够把你的论点讲清楚。

2、分析

“分析”一词本身就暗含有一定的深度。好的分析会使用清晰并能论证主题的推理和例子。支持也许是相关的，但也可能会显得过于宽泛或简单化。你可能已经触及到了主题，但你不能像那些复杂的例子一样进行深入探索。优秀的分析是对深入剖析思考后的批评。它对那些没有进行好好分析的设想和细节进行了批评。在上面的例子中，好的分析提到了暴力会导致自杀的危害，并且举出了三件由可能会发生在别人身上的事，但却并没有涉及一些会引发思考的领域，例如社会价值观、政府调控、对下一代人的影响。

如果你想写出好的论文文章，那么上文中的Assignment写作高分技巧也是你所要必须掌握的，以上技巧与要点相信会对你有一定的帮助。如果留学生们需要代写assignment欢迎随时来找我们美国高阶论文AdvancedThesis教育网，我们将竭诚为您服务。

毕业论文格式：互惠利他主义

在： ,

毕业论文格式：互惠利他主义

在这种利他主义行为中，一直有许多分析人士认为，个别国家的捐赠行为对援助和援助效果有很大的影响。在较大的人口统计中，对于接受援助的国家应该具备什么样的条件，存在着固有的困惑(Nowak, Sigmund. 562)。因此，向人民提供援助的行为带有互惠原则。这些条件符号是根据捐赠者和他们向人民提供的援助来解释的。互惠利他主义更清楚地定义了这些概念。这个概念最初是由Trivers提出的。在这些利他主义的概念中，预期接受方将由于他们所得到的好处而向另一方提供某种形式的互惠。它本质上是在这样一种情况下产生的，即接收方根据利他主义的规则被期望回报恩惠。这是一个复杂的动态过程，取决于每种情况。有必要从主观表征的角度分析这些模式(Collinson， & Elhawary 4)，可以认为这是一种以牙还牙的行为，也可以看作是一种超前的观念。在各国内部，在提供援助和援助的过程中，已经吸收了一些基本的概念和战略。
在商业交易中，有固定的资产买卖。退货由买卖双方商定。这是一种形式，所以双方相互同意了解资源和资源的用途。在这些原则中，议程是清楚的。在互惠关系中并非如此。这是在情境中最初给予者实际给予他们的化身。这一理念与现代慈善理念产生了共鸣。国家、公司和个人实体在帮助他人的同时，也期待着某些互惠的因素。在这个过程中，感激、鼓励和模糊的信息交换概念也得到了促进。在人道主义援助的情况下，互惠是模糊的。这种模糊的观念是人们在这一过程中产生困惑的原因。在分析在紧急情况下帮助这些国家的国家，例如在海啸期间向斯里兰卡和印度提供援助时，有一种基本的概念是向人民提供某种形式的有条件的援助(Hyndman 26)。然而，并非所有形式的援助或援助都带有互惠性。即使它带有互惠性，所有参与运营的利益相关者都能从中获益。

毕业论文格式：互惠利他主义

In this acts of altruism, there has been many analysts who argue that donor practices of the individual countries strongly influence aid and the effectiveness of the aid. There is inherent confusion in the larger demographies as to what conditions to postulate with the countries receiving assistance (Nowak, Sigmund. 562). Hence, the acts of assistance that is provided to the people are laced with principles of reciprocity. Those conditional notations have been explained based on the donors and the assistance that they provide to the people. Reciprocal altruism defines these notions more lucidly. This concept was originally introduced by Trivers. In these notions of altruism, it is expected that the receiving party would provide some forms of reciprocity to the other owing to the benefits they receive. It is inherently created in situation where the receiving party is expected to return the favors based on the rules of altruism. This is a complex dynamics that is dependent on each situation. There is a need to analyses these patterns from subjective representation (Collinson, & Elhawary 4). It could be considered to be a tit for tat act or pay it forward notion. Within nations, there are an underlying notions and strategies that have been imbibed during this process of providing aid and assistance.
In commercial transactions, there is a fixed selling or buying of assets. The returns are agreed by the parties in the sale. This is a form so mutual agreement between the parties to understand about the resources and the utility of the resources. In these principles the agendas are known clearly. This is not the case in reciprocity. There is the embodiment that the original giver in the situation is actually giving them. This concept resonates with the modern day philanthropy ideologies. Countries, companies and individual entities help another person while expecting certain reciprocal elements. Gratitude, encouragement and the obscure notions of information exchange is also facilitated in this process. In the case of humanitarian assistance, the reciprocity is kind of nebulous. This hazy notion is the reason for the people to be perplexed in the process. On analysis of the nations who helped the countries during exigent circumstances such as providing aid to Srilanka and India during the times of tsunami there was an underlying notion of some form of conditional help that has been provided to the people (Hyndman 26). However, not all forms of assistance or aid are laced with reciprocity. Even if it is laced with reciprocity there is gain for all the stakeholders involved in the operation.