assignment代寫：資本投資與技術引入
這種情況較難解決，需要適當的政策支助來消除其產生。 Lewis(2011)指出，資本對技術工人是友好的，並投資於技術，假設資本將吸引更多的技術工人，因為技術被引入生產和勞動活動。因此，資本投資尋求更多熟練勞動力的影響將對當地勞動力產生一些影響，直到當地勞動力不具備生產活動的技術訣竅為止。在這種情況下，當對移民到其他欠發達國家的本國勞動力進行深入研究時，結論將是模糊的，不能證明或令人滿意的。在研究將移民和本地勞動力視為彼此的替代品所產生的短期影響時，必須考慮到土著勞動力不斷向其他市場流動以使自己免受移民湧入的影響。當移民與本地人相輔相成，共同努力達到一個共同的目的或目標時，公司就會蓬勃發展，國家就會進步，移民和本地人的勞動就會促進經濟的進步。
當移民工人的技能提高，而本國工人的技能降低時，他們可以和諧地工作，以實現生產的組織目標。然而，兩者之間將會有工資差異，這可能會在兩組勞工團體之間造成內部裂痕或衝突。 Pritchett(2006)提出了一個觀點，觀察全球勞動者之間收入的不平等是允許全球勞動者在全球流動中享有更多自由的主要原因，他們可以在全球範圍內為自己工作，提升自己的生活方式。在考慮潛在的影響因素之前，這似乎是正確的，而這些因素是改變全球勞動力流動自由結論的重要原因。解決兩類勞動者之間衝突的最有效辦法是保持一定的最低標准定價，不使工資差距擴大，以侮辱本國勞動者的形式出現。
assignment代寫：資本投資與技術引入
Such situations are more difficult to be resolved and needs proper policy support to eliminate its arising. Lewis (2011) notes that capital is skilled labour friendly and invests in technology assuming that capital will attract more skilled labours due to the induction of technology into production and labour activities.Thus, the impact of capital investments seeking more skilled labour will have some impact on native labour until the native labour are not equipped with the technical knowhow of the production activities. It is suggested that in such cases, when there is a deep research of the native labours immigrating to other less developed countries the conclusion will be vague and not evidential or satisfactory. The constant movement of native labours to other markets to save themselves from the immigrants’ influx is an important factor to be considered when studying the short term impacts of considering immigrant and native labour as substitutes to each other. When the immigrants and natives are complementing each other and working together to meet a common end or a goal, the company flourishes, the country progresses and enhances the economic progress of immigrants and native labours.
When the immigrant labours are more skilled and the native labours are less skilled, they can work in harmony to fulfil the organisational objectives of production. However, there will be a wage difference between the two and this may create internal rift or conflict between the two set of labour groups. Pritchett(2006) puts forward a thought that observing the global inequality in income between labours is the prime reason for allowing more freedom in global mobility for labours across the world where they can work for themselves and upgrade their lifestyle. This looks true before considering the hidden factors of influence which makes for a great case of changing the conclusion about the freedom in global labour mobility. The most fruitful solution in the arising of conflicts between the two groups of labours is to keep some minimum standard pricing where the wage difference does not escalate and the takes the shape of personal insult for the native labours.