代写dissertation：理解项目承包商和承包业务

代写dissertation：理解项目承包商和承包业务

基于行业平均水平的同情,这两家公司的性能如下:

利润率和轮值表Midas远远落后于行业平均水平。然而,公司的ROCE,操作乘数和当前的杠杆比率表明公司的更好的性能都很好,效率和低风险。但是,麦得斯必须改善其利润率比和总资产回报率比。

相反,利润率和落石的轮值表比行业平均水平。然而,公司的ROCE操作乘数和目前的杠杆比率低于行业平均水平。因此,公司必须提高效率和性能的收入最大化。

杜邦系统还显示如下:

在几乎所有的计算,左手边不等于右边的Midas计算。而对于落石双方只有轻微的差异。它可以分析如下:

根据第一个和第二个公式,迈达斯必须改善其营业利润率。按照过去的公式,它需要改善其轮值表。落石必须改善其操作乘数。

代写dissertation：理解项目承包商和承包业务

Based on the compassion with the industry average, the performance of both the companies is as follows:

The profit margin and ROTA of Midas are far behind from industry average. However, the company’s ROCE, operating multiplier and current gearing ratios are very well indicating the company’s better performance, efficiency and low risk. But, Midas has to improve its profit margin ratio and return on total assets ratio.

On the contrary, the profit margin and ROTA of Rock Fall are better than the industry average. However, the company’s ROCE, operating multiplier and current gearing ratios are less than that of industry average. Hence, the company has to improve the efficiency and performance to maximize the revenue.

The Du Pont system also reveals the following:

In almost all calculations, the left hand side is not equal to the right hand side of calculations for Midas. Whereas for Rock Fall has only slight differences in both sides. It can be analysed as follows:

As per the first and second formulae, Midas has to improve its operating margin. As per the last formula, it needs to improve its ROTA. Rock Fall has to improve its operating multiplier.