代写留学生论文:主张军事干预:必要性有多强?
代写留学生论文:主张军事干预:必要性有多强?
叙利亚的争论有不同的观点。例如，英国广播公司（2013）提出的论点，所谓的化学武器攻击对叙利亚是导致美国军事反应。在这里，军事进攻可以得到道义和人道主义的支持。国际人权律师罗伯森-杰弗里-英国国际人权律师事务所说，“安全理事会的决议”从未有过任何需要（英国广播公司，2013）。这是在联合国决议通过帮助叙利亚。罗伯森说，在联合国决议发生之前，曾经有过采取行动打击海盗和奴隶制的时代，在这些情况下，不需要联合国决议。他清楚地指出，当世界禁止化学武器的时候，在世界的某些部分实际上使用化学武器时，它不应该是不活跃的。但同时罗伯森也认为，刑事归责在任何形式的行动是对他们采取了极为必要的。这里的人的罪责已经被证明是叙利亚。他说，有可能是政治和道德的因素，必须加以分析。在这些参数中，有两种观点的本身，都是观点支持军事行动，但是在一个它被认为是支持军事行动的背景下非常强烈的人道主义事业使得它必须不等待。在其他形式中，作者提出了一种更为谨慎的观点。在这里，作者指出，在对另一方采取军事行动时，有任何国家必须确保其充分了解国家罪行。
代写留学生论文:主张军事干预:必要性有多强?
There are different perspectives on the Syrian argument. BBC (2013) for instance presents the argument that the alleged chemical weapons attack against Syria is what led to the US military response. Here the military attack can be supported on moral and humanitarian grounds. Geoffrey Robertson QC, an international human rights lawyer states that “There has never been any need for a Security Council resolution” (BBC, 2013). This comes in the wake of the UN resolution that has been passed for helping Syria. Robertson states that before the UN resolution happenings there have been times when action has been taken against piracy and slavery and an UN resolution was not needed in those cases. He states clearly that when the world bans chemical weapons, it should not in any way be inactive when some part of the world is actually using chemical weapons against them. However at the same time Robertson also asserts that it is extremely necessary that the culpability of the criminal be established before any form of action is taken against them. Here the people whose culpability has to be proved are that of the Syrian State. He asserts that there could be political and moral elements that have to be analyzed. In these arguments that are presented there are two perspectives by itself, both are perspectives supporting military action, however in one it is seen that the context for military action is supported very strongly as the humanitarian cause makes it necessary to not wait. In the other form the author has presented a more caution oriented perspective. Here the author states that there any state when entering into military action against another has to ensure that it is fully aware of the nations crime.
