Argument about favor of corporate social reasonability being with the faith that it is in companies’ long-term self interest to be socially responsibility. It means that if company want have wealth in the future, it must take action now that to make sure its long-term viability. A second argument in favor of CSR is that it will avoid government regulation. This is a very practical reason, and it is based on the opinion that future government intervention can be monopolize to the extent that companies polices itself with self-restraint standard and performance society’s expectations of it. Above two arguments in favor of corporate social responsibility include ‘let business try’ and ‘business has the resources’. Another reasons for corporate social responsibility is that proacting (anticipating, initiating and planning) is better than reacting. This generally means that proacting is less costly and more practical than simply reacting to social problems once they have surfaced. At the end, it has been argued that companies should engage in corporately social responsibility as the public strongly stand by it. Currently, the public trust that if business want to pursuits of profit, it should be responsible to their communities, workers and other stakeholders (Bernstein, 2000).