代写论文:在美国和加拿大工会密度不同
代写论文:在美国和加拿大工会密度不同
加拿大和美国是两个世界的发达国家,有大量的工人支付。但是,有一个巨大的差异两国联盟的密度。一方面,加拿大的工会参与率是29%,美国只有14%的工会密度。这清楚表明,美国更多的电离相比,加拿大。另一个区别是该行业的结构。在美国,更多的电离在许多行业,如制造业相比,加拿大。美国和加拿大也有不同的法律制度由于存在差别的工会化导致工会密度不同。不同程度的反对管理是一个工会密度差异的主要原因的两个国家。这两个国家有不同类型的公众态度和价值观(弗雷格凯利,2003)。工人在加拿大的比例低于美国工会密度的另一个区别是,美国的黑人工人的比例相对高于在加拿大的。一个又一个不同的是,在两国的联盟在美国工会成员由比加拿大的年轻人。请注意在这种情况下的另一个重要的事情是公共部门和私营部门的工会。在加拿大公共部门工会高出40%的私营部门,在美国只有30%。不同车间的职业组成是影响工会和另一种方法可能是另一个重要的区别,影响两国联盟密度(心烦意乱,s·M。& Meltz,2000)。
代写论文:在美国和加拿大工会密度不同
Canada and U.S. are the two developed nations of the world where there are a large number of paid workers. But, there is a vast difference in the union density of the two countries. On one hand, the union density of Canada is 29 percent; U.S. has the union density of 14 % only. This clearly states that U.S. is more ionized in comparison to Canada. Another difference is the structure of the industry. In US, it is far more ionized in a number of sectors such as the manufacturing in comparison to Canada. U.S. and Canada also has a different legal regime due to which there is a difference in the unionization which creates a difference in the Union Density. Difference in the degree of opposition from the management is a major reason for the difference in the union densities of the two nations. Both the nations have different types of public attitude and the values (Frege& Kelly, 2003). The proportion of workers in Canada is lower than U.S. Another difference in the union density is that the proportion of the black workers in U.S. is comparatively higher than the ones in Canada. A yet another difference in the Union of the two countries is that in USA the union members consists of more youths than in Canada. Another important thing to note in this case is the unionism in the public sector and private sector. While in Canada the Public sector unionism is 40 % higher than the one in Private Sector, in U.S. it is only 30 % higher. Difference in the occupational composition of the workshop is another method which influence the unions and it may be another important difference which affect the union density in the two countries (Upset, S. M., & Meltz, 2000).
