个人陈述代写：避税

个人陈述代写：避税

避税不是世界所见的一种新现象，但它的崛起必然与全球化的加剧和国际市场的相互依存关系密切相关。当跨国公司在不同市场上的业务表现依赖增加时，它就会沉溺于法律领域，在那里可以找到逃避税收的漏洞。这纯粹是由许多小而富裕的岛国所做的，这些国家向跨国公司提供税收优惠，以换取它们的存在和投资回报。这些小国希望获得资金支持和增长，并通过支持立法提供法律支持，提供秘密税收政策，以掩盖跨国公司的收入。

个人陈述代写：避税

星巴克英国的情况,这让高达£30亿1998 – 2012年期间,但纳税总额£860万。对如此巨大的销售额征收最低限度的税收是对立法者、政府和公民的讽刺和困惑。该公司通过使用复杂的许可证交易和协议，通过避税天堂，将这些资金用于避税，并允许其将大部分利润返还给东道国英国，从而将大部分利润返还给该国。

个人陈述代写：避税

Tax avoidance is not a new phenomenon that the world has seen, but assuredly its rise can be linked with intensification of globalization and increased inter-dependency of international markets. When business performance dependency increases on different markets over which the multinational has no or limited control, it indulges into areas of law where it can find a loophole to escape taxes. This is purely done by many small but rich island nations which offer tax holidays to multinationals for their presence and investments in return. These small nations desire funds for sustenance and growth and offer secret tax policies to conceal multinationals’ income by providing legal support through favouring legislations.

个人陈述代写：避税
Taking the case of Starbucks UK, it made a whopping £3 billion during the period 1998-2012, but the paid tax totalling £8.6 million. This bare minimum tax on such huge sales is an irony and a puzzle to the lawmakers, the government, and the citizens. The company manages to pay such little tax by funnelling the funds through tax havens using complex licensing deals and agreements that allow it to take back majority of profits to the country with the least tax and pay negligible amount in tax to the host country UK.