华盛顿大学论文代写：领导的基础

华盛顿大学论文代写：领导的基础

大多数的飞行员的判断来确定合理与不合理的行动，无论任务的自然课之间的能力。由于飞行员被教导的方法完成目标任务训练的开始。

这是一个重大的权力，当谈到航空。然而，情况正好相反，谁是熟练的和有自信，他们的经历，灵活性往往LED悲惨的结果（明茨伯格，1973）。

有太多的人在这个案例研究。主要有两种人的故事，如荷兰和中校指挥人员在飞兆半导体空军基地。中校荷兰是在飞兆半导体空军基地评估部主任。他是负责所有飞行作业，在翼飞行标准执行。一个优秀的飞行记录在检查乘5200小时31-0，他是一个有天赋的飞行员。他也飞一些B-52和H的飞行模型因为他职业生涯的开始。他被称为一个最好的飞行员。在1991至1994年间，他可怜的导航模式开始开始中将荷兰印象经验丰富的航空飞行员的指挥监督的影响。缺乏重视，未能执行适当的纪律和失效文件的分析是主要的失败在这里领导。

华盛顿大学论文代写：领导的基础

Most of the aviators have the ability of judgment to determine between the reasonable and unreasonable courses of action disregarding the mission’s nature. Since the beginning of the training the aviators are being taught the methods for accomplishing the objectives of mission.

It is one of the major powers when it comes to aviation. However the situation is just opposite with the experienced ones who are skilled and have self-confidence for them, flexibility can often led to tragic results (Mintzberg, 1973).

There were too many persons involved within this case study. Mainly there were two people in the story, such as Lt Col Holland and the commanding supervisors at Fairchild Air Force Base. Lt Col Holland was the chief of evaluation department at Fairchild-AFB. He was responsible for the enforcement of in-flight standards for all the flying operations in the wing. With an excellent flying track record of 5,200 hours and 31-0 on check rides, he was a gifted pilot. He had also flown some B-52 and H flight models since the beginning of his career. He was entitled as one of the best pilots. Between the period of 1991 to 1994, his poor airmanship pattern started to begin Lt. Holland’s impression of experienced flight pilot influenced the commanding supervisors. The lack of attention, failure to enforce proper discipline and failure document the analysis were main failures of leadership here.