代写毕业论文

基督城国际学院:分析案例

基督城国际学院:分析案例

合资企业正面临的性能问题。执行设计有限公司ED和办公室设计合作伙伴(泰国)有限公司ODP被认为面临的问题。罗伯特常指出的主要问题是低效率的简单的日常交流。各级员工的组织,特别是在曼谷办公室被认为使用英语作为共同的语言。然而这是不正确的沟通媒介,台湾认为他们不是天才在英语和泰国也无法交谈。这导致了泰国和台湾之间的沟通问题。Ed将只指导和ODP等待Ed铅和后抱怨他们没有动手

的基本方面是让员工表达他们的意见。必须听员工意见和执行合理的需要必须完成。他们应该听到的原因和功能组织的以某种方式与员工必须清楚地告知大众。人事和员工说话必须能够讲清楚,讲与员工有关的相关信息。这应该是更像一个谈话而不是独白。公司必须保持开放的新思想,尝试任何新想法合并到现有的过程当“公司语言可以促进子公司之间的通信和总部和子公司之间;它可以,不过,也给总部一种虚假的安全感如果总部人员认为公司里的每个人都在公司里流利的语言”(瓦尔纳和比默,2011,p.62)。理想的员工和公司之间的交互时必须有适当的开展奠定基础。

基督城国际学院:分析案例

The Joint venture was facing performance problems. Executive Design Ltd ED and the Office Design partners (Thailand) Ltd ODP were seen to face issues. Robert Chang points out the primary issues being that of the inefficient simple daily communication. Employees at all levels of the organization, especially in the Bangkok office were seen to use English as the common language. However this was the not the right medium of communication, as the Taiwanese believed they were not as gifted in English and could not converse in Thai either. This led to communication issues between the Thai and the Taiwanese. Ed expected to only guide and ODP waited for ED to lead and later complained that they were not being hands-on

The fundamental aspects are allowing the employees to voice their opinion. The employee views must be listened and execution of their reasonable needs must be done. They should be heard and the reasons for the functioning of the organization in a certain way must be clearly communicated with the employee. The personnel who speak to the employee must be in a position to speak clearly, speak relevant details pertaining to the employee. This should be more like a conversation instead of a monologue. The company must remain open to new ideas and try to incorporate any new ideas into the existing process for when “A company language facilitates communication among subsidiaries and between headquarters and subsidiaries; it can, however, also give headquarters a false sense of security if headquarters personnel think that everyone in the company is fluent in the company language” (Varner and Beamer, 2011, p.62). Ideally when there is interaction between the employees and the company there must be proper groundwork undertaken by them.