留学文书代写：思想
留学文书代写：思想
我们头脑中所思考的任何事情，首先都是通过感觉器官来感知的。然后，大脑玩弄感知，形成对同一事物的解释。变量解释在这里更重要，因为它们构成了一个人思考和得出结论的基础。这些解释总是深受社会、政治、认识论、本体论和个人经验的影响。一种力量压倒另一种力量，从而在人的头脑中形成一种结论，这就成为交流的内容。这就引发了一种反应，从而推动了这一思想的发展，其中一些思想后来成为了塑造未来一代人思想及其后续行动的意识形态。Marton(1986)在他的现象学研究中谈到，当被问到一个问题时，被试是如何以不同的方式回答的。马顿的论点是，在没有进行的研究中，所有涉及的主题都有一致的决定。这表明，不同的人思考、感知和结论是不同的，这永远不能给出一个完全结论性的理论。
因此，它永远不可能对未来的行动是可靠的，但作为研究的学习方法的知觉的想法并没有得到应有的信任。Appelbaum(1995)认为，依赖于“方法”更危险，因为它吸引了信徒/研究人员采用它的思维方式，而忽略了其他无数未被探索的被遗漏的结论。因此，如果感知是学习和思维制造的起源，那么研究方法如何依赖最终的结论。那不是与那与它的简单和有机的存在相违背的吗?知觉，或者就此而言，大众的知觉，不是形成研究方法的结论的真正指南，而不是方法的机械过程吗?这必须遵循这样一种认识过程，本质上是神圣的，是一种自我表现的行为，它必须是人的思想火花的支柱，人最终会认识到一种思想并使之成为一种意识形态。
留学文书代写：思想
Anything that is thought over by our mind is first perceived through the organs of senses. The mind then plays with the perception and forms interpretations about the same. The variable interpretations are the ones which are more important here because they form the basis of how a person thinks and makes conclusions. These interpretations are always influenced heavily by social, political, epistemological, ontological, and by personal experiences. The one influence which overpowers the others wins in forming a conclusion in the mind of man, and this becomes the content of communication. This then ignites a response and thus goes on the development of the idea, where some goes on to become ideologies that shape the mind of future generation and their subsequent actions. Marton (1986) in his research about phenomenography speaks about how subjects when asked a question answers in different and distinct ways. Marton’s contention is that in no research conducted there has been a unanimous decision of all subjects involved. This indicates that different people think, perceive, and conclude differently which can never give a fully conclusive theory.
Hence, it can never be reliable for future actions, but due credit is not given to the idea of perception as the learning method of research. Appelbaum (1995) asserts that reliance on the ‘method’ is more dangerous because it attracts the believer/researcher to its way of thinking and leaving aside other innumerable left-out conclusions that remain unexplored. Hence, if perception is the origin of learning and thought manufacturing, how a final conclusion can be relied upon in a research method. Is not that contrary to the one which is against its simple and organic existence? Is not perception or, for that matter, popular perception the real guide in forming conclusions about a research method instead of the mechanical procedures of a method? This must follow that the perception procedure, divine in nature, a self-manifesting action, must be the backbone of the sparks in the mind of man who eventually perceives a thought and makes it an ideology.
