论文 重复率-趋同假说
论文 重复率-趋同假说
在这个模型中，我们提出了趋同假设，这将会使媒体更好的成长，并改善社会。在这种情况下，趋同假说试图解释理想的沟通方式。有人说，这可以从高度活跃的观众参与中产生。这是指媒介系统在社会中的节约和集中的运动。根据这一框架，各系统的合并基本上将在欧洲进行。大众文化政治将会衰落，新闻业或自由主义模式将会更加美国化。这种商业化将成为问题同质化的主要切入点。然而，这种趋同模式将受到个别国家政治制度的影响。该收敛假设系统是“自顶向下”和“自底向上”过程的组合。消费者是决定媒体系统融合的主要人群，他们能够处理融合模型的好处，这将使参与过程的所有利益相关者受益。
Hallin and Mancine framework在开发许多度量标准方面都是有益的，并且是构建不同媒体系统和解决每个系统中的固有漏洞的先驱项目之一。对这种媒体的普遍批评是，它没有包含更多的异质变量。它也忽略了国家的传统大小，也没有考虑到区域主义的概念。这个系统中没有考虑较新的媒体平台。它被批评过分强调政治结构，而且没有考虑到跨领域的媒体系统的混合的许多概念。尽管存在这些漏洞，但这是一个有效的工具，因为它考虑到了其他几个变量。因此，这一理论可以作为一个主要的工具和其他意识形态可以混合来解决这一理论中提出的差距。
论文 重复率-趋同假说
It was proposed in this model that the convergence hypothesis would lead to better growth for the media and would improve the society. In this scenario, convergence hypothesis tries to explain about the ideal way of communication. It has been states that this can be stemmed from highly active audience participation. This refers to the motions of economization and concentration of the media system in the societies.According to this framework the convergence of the systems would essentially occur in Europe. There would be decline of the mass culture politics and there would be more Americanization of the journalism or rather the liberal model. This commercialization would become the main tangent by which there would be homogenization of the issues. Nevertheless, this convergence model will be influenced by the political systems of the individual countries. This system of convergence hypothesis is found to be a combination of “top-down” and “bottom-up” process. Consumers are the main people who decide the convergence of the media system, and they are able to address to the benefits of convergence model that would benefit all the stakeholders involved in the process.
Hallin and Mancine framework has been beneficial in developing many metrics and was one of the pioneering ventures of structuring the different media system and addressing the inherent vulnerabilities in each of these systems. The general criticism for this medium is that it had not included many more heterogeneous variables. It also neglects the traditional size of the countries and does not factor in the notions of regionalism. Newer media platforms are not factored in this system. It has been critiqued for over emphasis of the political structure and does not factor in many notions of hybridizing of the media systems across the spectrum. In spite of these vulnerabilities this is found to be an effective tool because it factors in several other variables. Hence this theory can be used as a major tool and other ideologies can be mixed to address the gaps proposed in this theory.
以上是美国高阶论文AdvancedThesis网提供。如果你觉得本文还不够详尽，可以再看看本站其它相关文章，或许对你有用。另外，如果需要美国代写论文，就点击上方栏目列表，各种服务等着你，客服24小时在线，欢迎咨询!
