论文代写：20世纪美国的同性恋
论文代写：20世纪美国的同性恋
为同性恋而奋斗正在长久。同性恋已经从1973年“美国精神病学协会”的精神疾病诊断分类中删除了。在亨利·L·米尔顿的“脱离偏见：同性恋权利与解放的科学在美国的历史”一书中，他强调了那些美国的同性恋活动家利用科学研究改善同性恋权利斗争的进展（Minton，2002）。亨利对19世纪末以来的同性恋解放者研究进行了深入的分析，直到其在1970年的疾病模型中具有挑战性的角色。亨利检查了未发表的手稿和档案来源，揭示了研究者的真实生活故事。历史上的社会误解和虐待同性恋和医疗当局在这个（斯坦因，2004年）发挥特色的作用。例如马丁·杜布曼（Martin Duberman）的“治愈同性恋自传”，表明精神科医生生存着整个社会的偏见。
早些时候的婚姻被认为是经济制度，而不是情感的纽带。人们简单地把它看作是男女之间的一种关系，作为调动土地财富的手段，以保证男子被抽中生产的和平关系，并使妇女适应生育和育儿的作用。随着社会经济结构的变化进一步导致社会态度对性的改变（Duyvendak，2009）。家庭的崛起和与男女生产和生育有关的领域划分凸显了男女之间不平等的情况。
论文代写：20世纪美国的同性恋
Struggle for Homosexuality is undergoing since long. Homosexuality has been removed from the diagnostic classification of mental illness of ‘The American Psychiatric Association’ in 1973. In the book “Departing from Deviance: A History of Homosexual Rights & Emancipatory Science in America” by Henry L. Milton he has emphasized on those gay and lesbian activists of America those who used scientific research for improving the advancements in struggle for homosexual rights (Minton, 2002). Henry has made an in-depth analysis of the gay and lesbian emancipator research since late 19th century till its challenging role in the illness model of 1970. Henry had examined unpublished manuscripts and archival sources for revealing the accomplishments of the researchers with their real life stories. The society since historic times misunderstand and mistreat homosexuals and the medical authorities plays a featured role in this (Stein, 2004). For example Martin Duberman’s Cures a gay autobiography, it is shown that psychiatrists eco the prejudices of the society at large.
Earlier marriages were seen as economic institution instead of an emotional bond. It was simply seen as a relationship between men and women as a means of transferring the wealth in terms of land for securing peaceful relations where men were drawn for production and women were fitted into the role of reproduction and child rearing. With the changes in the economic structure of the society which further led to the alterations in the attitudes of society towards sexuality (Duyvendak, 2009). The rise in the family and division of spheres related to production and reproduction between men and women highlighted the situation of inequality between the sexes.
