North-eastern University has been performing consistently better than LNU. North-eastern University and LNU have been gaining funding from multiple sources. There is more foreign university exposure for the North-eastern University. These students have more access to the trends of the world universities. This makes them to consistently perform better than LNU. The source of funding is not the problem for LNU. Rather it is the application of the funding to improve the student performance, there is more space for innovation in North-eastern University. Allocation of educational resources plays an integral part in the student development process. However, the students need to be guided with appropriate teachers and technology to sustain. Technical skills that are relevant for commercial success in the recent times lead to the growth of the student performance. There are many more intangible variables that can be considered when defining the success of a student. Nevertheless, the student’s performance in future careers and academic marks have been addressed in this analysis and these seem to make good proxies. To sum up, North-eastern University performs better. This is due to the increase in exposure of the students and foreign university collaboration. This University has changed their brand image to meet the demands of the current situation.
It is recommended that LNU University bring in more foreign investors and a liberalized scheme to develop their institution.
Innovation and development of resources that are needed for technical skill development need to be fostered. These two universities also focus on students from all around China and ensure that there is distributive justice (Johnson 312). They need to develop appropriate targeting of the students for their academic success.