论文代写：监督与隐私权

论文代写：监督与隐私权
这个词是误导性的。如果任何人在“间谍商店”看起来像在城市中兴盛的足够清晰。他可以买摄像机;用于窃听的电话设备，用于全球定位的卫星使所有设备能够跟踪是监视的工具。他们每个人都在小规模使用。在每天的监督下和大多数情况下，只使用一个人;人们通常彼此都知道。在进行任何调查时，单独了解触发的监视，但监视的类型几乎在所有方面都可用。在权力关系方面，个人监督是一回事，机构监督是另一回事。现在，监视依赖于网络计算机的力量，这是现代世界官僚政治的一个方面。这取决于所有用于搜索的数据库来检索某些内容并使用相关的数据进行处理。
隐私权结束

在20世纪，全球范围内从大众接受的反应表明，通过监视，我们是否“结束了隐私”？另一方面，很多作者批评说，在某些监视系统的记录或追踪中，隐藏的地方较少。日常活动似乎没有豁免的观察。大多数作者将其视为“隐私的终结”，以此来庆祝。在电子商务蓬勃发展的时代，消费者的个人信息得到高层流传，宣称隐私已经死亡。
必须引入这样一个观点，即隐私是一个涉及文化和历史相对的可变概念。在隐私死亡的情况下，这是隐私权的一部分，尤其是作为财产的个人，有关个人财产的法律是现代世界历史的一切发明。

论文代写：监督与隐私权
This term is misleading. If anyone visits in the “spy stores” seems, as the flourish up in the city is clear enough. He can buy the video cameras; telephone equipment for tapping, satellite for global positioning enabled all the devices for tracking are the tools of the surveillance. Each of them is use at the small-scale. On daily basis, it uses one person under the surveillance and in most of the cases; people generally are known to each other. At the time of doing any investigation, triggered surveillance was known individually but the types of the surveillance are available almost in every respect. In the respect of the power relations, surveillance at an individual level is one thing and institutional surveillance is another one. Now days, surveillance is dependent on the networked computer power as an aspect of the bureaucratic administration in this modern world. It depends on all the databases use for search to retrieve something and use the relevant data for processing.
End of Privacy

In the 20th century, responses globally received from the mass of people states that through surveillance, Are we “ending the privacy”? On the other side, many authors criticized that there are fewer place to hide in the sense that some of the system of surveillance record or traced. Daily activities seem no exemption from the observation. Most of the authors notice it as the “end of the privacy” as something to celebrate. In the time where ecommerce is on the boom and the personal data of the consumers gets circulate at the high level, it declared that the privacy is dead.
It is essential to bring in the notice that, privacy is the mutable concept involves both cultural and historically relative. In the case of privacy is dead, it is the part of the privacy, like particularly to the individual as the property, legal relating to the personal property is all invention of history in this present modern world.