This term is misleading. If anyone visits in the “spy stores” seems, as the flourish up in the city is clear enough. He can buy the video cameras; telephone equipment for tapping, satellite for global positioning enabled all the devices for tracking are the tools of the surveillance. Each of them is use at the small-scale. On daily basis, it uses one person under the surveillance and in most of the cases; people generally are known to each other. At the time of doing any investigation, triggered surveillance was known individually but the types of the surveillance are available almost in every respect. In the respect of the power relations, surveillance at an individual level is one thing and institutional surveillance is another one. Now days, surveillance is dependent on the networked computer power as an aspect of the bureaucratic administration in this modern world. It depends on all the databases use for search to retrieve something and use the relevant data for processing.
End of Privacy
In the 20th century, responses globally received from the mass of people states that through surveillance, Are we “ending the privacy”? On the other side, many authors criticized that there are fewer place to hide in the sense that some of the system of surveillance record or traced. Daily activities seem no exemption from the observation. Most of the authors notice it as the “end of the privacy” as something to celebrate. In the time where ecommerce is on the boom and the personal data of the consumers gets circulate at the high level, it declared that the privacy is dead.
It is essential to bring in the notice that, privacy is the mutable concept involves both cultural and historically relative. In the case of privacy is dead, it is the part of the privacy, like particularly to the individual as the property, legal relating to the personal property is all invention of history in this present modern world.