Then less conflict and difference in the interpretation of the financial accounts exist. The private and public sector companies are required to follow these guidelines without deviation under any circumstances, as it may call for a violation of accounting practices. Moreover, the steps are also suggested by the authorities to move closer to a globally aligned accounting standard, where financial reporting is more similar among all liable entities. This benefits the accounting practices and the ethical code of the sector. This is because it has always been mired with controversies of misleading, misinforming, and intentional refraining from disclosing correct information
The SAC4 framework presents criteria for the recognition of the elements of financial reporting like assets, liabilities, equity, expenses, revenues, etc. These criteria are to be followed by public and private sector companies, so that the recognition of these elements becomes easier. However, the underlying motivation among private and public sector companies for deviating from these criteria and the requirements remains resisting devaluation and expediting higher valuation. These motivations are again motivated by the market dynamics where companies are valued and devalued as per their financial strength and their accounting details. Much time and money goes into such investigations, but no specific results comes out due to the lobbying community influence, which again is a legal right to cover these irregularities with their mighty influence. The Lobbying Code of Conduct states that “the interaction between lobbyists and government representatives must be conducted in accordance with the public expectations of transparency, integrity and honesty” (McKeown 2014). The question about how such supernatural elements of ethics like transparency, integrity, and honesty are maintained when a lobbyist acts solely to enhance his self-interest and interacts with a government representative is ambiguous. Lobbying for self-interest enhancement is never democratic in nature. It is in itself an anti-law. Lobbying efforts by private and public sector companies is destroying Australia and its democratic nature of the fairness of business and its continuance (Menadue 2015). Simply put such illusions of being honest while working on advancing self-interest is fictitious and covered by the democratic stamp of legitimising lobbying.
As an example, in the SAC4 framework, the recognition of an asset is mandatory when the future economic benefits would take place that are enclosed in the financial accounts. By that requirement, companies should consider all profit centres to be regarded as assets as they evaluate a profit one way or another, either now or in the future. This is a strenuous call for companies, because reporting these activities, goods and services as assets would invite a tax, which means less profit and less ability to hoard cash for future uncertainties and expansion. This very reason makes companies appoint lobbyists who interact with government representatives to curtail stringent requirements and replace them with an illusory requirement. This illusory requirement when followed hides the immorality of misinformation. Lobbying’s primary intent is misguided and misinterpreted, especially by the government who regard it as a necessary tool to advance a holistic and collaborative approach to promote streamlined business growth and social growth. However, lobbying has been completely diverted of its original intent and self-interest rules in all circumstances. Such actions are motivated through immoral actions, because these actions are predominantly biased and are not at all in the interest of the public and the citizenry. Lobbying is dirtying the fair intent that remains the foundation of a sound business, and it intentionally misuses the opportunity to serve the larger public. The lobbying opportunity is sadly not used for a wider public interest, but largely for private interests, which makes the profession of lobbying incompatible with fair business operation.
中国留学生英语论文不会写，可以找美国论文代写Advanced Thesis平台机构，美国论文代写Advanced Thesis平台机构有认真负责的写手老师，可以解决中国留学生的论文写作难题，保证论文原创，为留学生提供美国论文代写、report代写、essay代写、assignment代写等论文服务，并使用与美国各大高校同样权威的抄袭检测系统，让留学生们轻松应对论文写作并创作出专属个人的优秀论文！美国论文代写Advanced Thesis网站平台分享的所有论文范文，未经转载，不得私自转发或专用，如有发现，我们网站平台将会追责一切法律责任，望留学生们谅解！