美国本科申请：自由意志是否存在
美国本科申请：自由意志是否存在
很明显，科学家们还没有找到一个良好的独立的大脑功能测量方法来监测选择和决策，这就是为什么他们的结论与本文所述的事实不同的原因。这是一个要求，以找出质量和可靠的标记，有意识的工具，为决策，使科学家可以理解，自由意志确实存在，它是由行动控制，太。当意识和潜意识倾向于相互作用和履行责任时，它们之间发生的功能是不同的。在这种情况下，新的研究表明，自由意志为意识所接受，而潜意识不会干预表现自由意志的行为。对于任何大脑活动或做出的决定，我们都有责任。人们可以自由选择任何事情，不幸的事情完全是因为错误的选择。由于自由意志是允许的，人们往往会做出错误的选择。有些人说一个人无法控制他们的潜意识，因此，自由意志是一种幻觉。这种想法是错误的。并非每个人都必须了解大脑内部是如何运作的。反过来，你也可以关注他们的行为。大脑不同层次的活动将自动发生，并在身体中显示反射。这一点经过仔细观察是很明显的。
另一种相反的观点认为，人类的思想创造了自由意志作为一种幻觉。思想往往会突然出现在人们的脑海中，而控制思想或思想的流动是不可能的。然而，这是错误的。当可以区分好与坏时，就可以区分决策。不是每个人都对做坏事感兴趣。每个人都可以自由地选择他们想做什么。世界上有好人和坏人(Klemm, 2010)。相反的论点是一个证据，证明惩罚不存在或不应该存在，但在现实中，它们确实存在。保护社会不受危险情况的影响是至关重要的，因此，自由意志所采取的行动的程度是受到控制的。虽然决定论指出，只选择一个事件过程是可能的，但在任何时间点都有可能偏离所选择的事件过程。因此，它是不相容的。正如哲学家阿瑟•叔本华(Arthur Schopenhaur)所言，一个人可以随心所欲地意愿一件事。神经哲学进一步表明，人类的神经方面的功能是自由的，没有硬性的规则。这一系列的动作都是在没有干扰的情况下进行的。
美国本科申请：自由意志是否存在
It is quite clear that the scientists have not identified a good independent measure of brain function to monitor the choices and decisions and this is the reason why their conclusion is different from the reality that is stated in this paper. It is a request to find out quality and reliable markers of conscious tools for decision making so that scientists can understand that free will does exist and it is controlled by actions, too. There is a difference in the functionalities happening between conscious and subconscious minds as they tend to interact and discharge responsibilities. In that case, new learning has shown that the free will is accepted by conscious mind and that the subconscious mind does not intervene in actions showing free will. For any brain activities or decisions made, we are responsible. People are free to choose any kind of event and misfortunate events are totally because of wrong choices. As free will is permitted, people tend to take wrong choices. Some people state that one cannot control their subconscious minds and hence, free will is an illusion (Debate, n.d). This thought is wrong. It is not mandatory for everyone to understand how the internal brain functions. In turn, one can keep an eye on actions performed by them. The activities across different levels of minds will happen automatically and display reflex in the body. It is evident upon close inspection.
Another counter argument says that the human mind has created free will as an illusion (Debate, n.d). Thoughts tend to pop into the minds of people and that it is impossible to control the thoughts or the way they flow. However, this is wrong. When it is possible to differentiate between good and bad, it is possible to differentiate decision. Not everyone would be interested to do evil actions. Every person is freely able to choose what they want to do. Good and bad people exist in the world (Klemm, 2010). The counter argument is an evidence that the punishment does not exist or should not exist but in reality, they do exist. It is essential to protect the society from situations of risk and hence, the level of actions performed by free will are controlled. While determinism states that it is possible to choose only one course of events, there is a possibility for deviation from the chosen course of events at any points of time. Hence, it is incompatible. As Arthur Schopenhaur (a philosopher) states, one can intend to will only one thing freely. The neurophilosophy has further shown that the neurological aspect of human beings function freely with no hard and fast rules. The series of actions take place with no interferences.
