美国大学论文：性取向

美国大学论文：性取向

简单地说，性取向可以被定义为一种长期的吸引模式，指向各种刺激，比如——情感、浪漫、性，有时是所有这些刺激的组合，指向同性、异性，有时两者兼而有之。它被称为性取向的基本依据，并根据吸引力的不同性质被进一步划分为不同的类型(Wilkerson &Khan, 2009)。分类是异性恋，同性恋，双性恋和无性恋。在这里，最好的说法是，那些不尝试将所有这些群体分类的人，使用了一种在现代世界很流行的总括性术语，那就是“酷儿”。LGBT(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人)范畴下的主流政治运动受到了性取向观念的影响，而性取向实际上根本不是一种选择。

美国大学论文：性取向
然而，威尔克森认为，有某些原因可以相信性取向在一定程度上是一种选择。威尔克森的论点主要是基于对性身份和性取向这一术语的标准区分。他提出的问题是什么时候是关于性取向的，以及是否有与之相关的选择。威尔克森的主要论点围绕着三个不同的陈述。第一个是，性取向是一种持久的欲望，实际上部分表现为在语境中进行的解释。第二个论点是关于解释所需要的选择因素，第三个论点是基于性取向的强项，性取向在一定程度上可以由选择一词构成。威尔克森的论点是建立在解释欲望的前提之上的，他认为这些欲望不仅说明了关于预先存在的欲望的信念。

美国大学论文：性取向

In simple words, sexual orientation can be defined as a long-term pattern of attraction that points towards various stimuli, like- emotion, romance, sex and sometimes the combination of all of these towards same sex, opposite sex and sometimes both. It is called the fundamental ground of sexual orientation which has been further categorized into different types as per the varying nature of attractions (Wilkerson &Khan, 2009). The categories are heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality and asexuality. Here, it would be better to state that those people who do not try to categories all these groups use a kind of umbrella terms which has become popular in the modern world and that is “Queer”. The mainstream political movement under the category of LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender)got influenced with the idea of sexual orientation which is actually not at all a choice.

美国大学论文：性取向
However, Wilkerson argued that there were certain reasons by which it could be believed that sexual orientation was partly comprised of a choice. The argument of Wilkerson was mainly based on a standard distinction regarding sexual identity and that of the term sexual orientation. The question he raised was about when it is about sexual orientation, and whether or not there is an involvement of choice associated with it. The major key arguments of Wilkerson revolve around three different statements. The first one is- Sexual orientation is an enduring desire which is actually partly represented by the interpretation going on within the context. The second argument is about the element of choice which is required by the interpretation and the third one is based on the strong point of sexual orientation which can be constituted by the term choice to a certain extent. The arguments of Wilkerson are based on the premise which is about the interpreting desires and he argued that these desires do not only illustrate a belief regarding a pre-existing desire.