美国丹佛大学论文代写：股东理论批判

美国丹佛大学论文代写：股东理论批判
对这个理论的分析是非常重要的，原因有几个。第一个原因就是这个理论被认为是以思维方式出现的，或者是一个哲学学派出现的企业管理学的着名和最突出的理论之一。作为人类实践的商业和作为哲学学科的伦理学之间的关系是岌岌可危的。其次，评估利益相关者理论是否有可能修改它所谈论的任何问题是非常重要的（Koberg，1987）。从一个非常不完善的世界，这些都是道德问题，其中大多数人攻击企业高管的社会责任。例如，有些政治机构和公开的政府可能会要求企业承担责任;虽然公司目前在严格的规章制度下工作，仍然公开呼吁更好的卫生，道路，就业机会和教育。

美国丹佛大学论文代写：股东理论批判
利益相关者理论在其环境中提供了对企业行为不足的解释。为观察关系提供解释性逻辑是理论发展的关键（Brenner和Cochran，1991）。弗里曼的工作并没有涉及联系企业的动态，以确定谁是受影响的概念和谁是谁的利益相关者。他像环境扫描一样识别出几个不同的过程，引出利益相关者的地图并与利益相关者进行交流。然而，这些过程的动力并没有具体的确定。

美国丹佛大学论文代写：股东理论批判
弗里曼在他的理论中提出了内部性，行动者和外部性之间不完全的联系（Stieb，2009）。他完全列出了个体行为者之间以及这些群体之间无限的关联，虽然他确实指出了外部和内部的利益相关者群体。该模型未能解决模型中建议的实际联系的复杂性，该联系表明可以将利益相关者群体清楚地识别为可分离的实体。也许，利益相关者群体所代表的利益集团所能确定的利益是无法被清晰地识别出来的。

美国丹佛大学论文代写：股东理论批判
An analysis of the theory is very important due to several reasons. The first reason is that this theory is regarded as one of the well-known and most prominent theories of the business management which came out with a way of thinking or with a philosophical school. The association between business as a human practice and Ethics as a philosophical discipline is at stake. Secondly, it is essential to evaluate if the theory of stakeholder is likely to amend any kind of issues which it talks about (Koberg 1987). From a highly imperfect world, these are the ethical problems of which most of them attack the executives of business with regards to social responsibility. For instance, there are cases wherein the political bodies and the publicly minded government might ask the business to take up their part of the responsibility; although the firms work currently under a very stringent rules and regulations and still public clamor for better sanitation, roads, employment opportunities and education.

美国丹佛大学论文代写：股东理论批判
An inadequate explanation of the behavior of the firm is provided by the Stakeholder theory within its environment. Rendering an explanatory logic for the relationships under observation is the key to theory development (Brenner and Cochran 1991). The work of Freeman does not address the dynamics which associate the firm to identify stakeholders beyond the concept of who is affected and by whom. Several different processes are identified by him like environmental scanning, eliciting stakeholders’ maps and exchanges with stakeholders. However, there is no specific identification of the motivating force of these processes.

美国丹佛大学论文代写：股东理论批判
An incomplete link between internalities, between actors and externalities is presented by Freeman in his theory (Stieb 2009). He completely maps out the limitless association between individual actors and between these groups even though he does identify external and internal stakeholder groups. The model fails to address the complexity of the real linkages suggested in the model which states that the groups of stakeholders could be identified clearly as the separable entities. Maybe, the interest which group represent could be identifies by the stakeholder groups cannot be identifies clearly.