美国论文被怀疑代写：作家书写的动机
美国论文被怀疑代写：作家书写的动机
作家写书和文章的动机，使他们写作的方式，他们已经写的文章。写传记的作者在写不同的作品时是不同的人，这表明同一作者可能有不同的情绪区域，在这种情绪区域下，创作原创作品的动机会上升。汤婷婷写了一本传记，描述了华裔美国人的正统情感，以及他们对女性表达性欲望和与陌生人发生性关系的权利有一个普遍而又非常严格的概念，就像汤婷婷阿姨的例子一样。写作清晰,描述了现场的场景彻底与每个快照时,村民们发现孩子在金斯敦的姑姑不是她的丈夫,而是一个陌生人,并考虑它作为罪恶往她家跑惩罚她,扔几个石头房子。本文所描述的这一情景与作者对女性婚外性主导思想的形成及其表达权的观念有着深刻的渊源。然而，当作者自己审视同样的传记写作时，她会变成一个不同的人，学会了新的概念，也忘记了一些概念。
美国论文被怀疑代写：作家书写的动机
这种争论导致了一个推论，即传记曾经是在作者处于一种特定的心理状态时写的，而当她写不同的文本时，她处于一种不同的心理状态;因此，如果我们用传记来评判同一作者的其他作品，读者可能会偏离作者想要传达的确切解释。卡罗尔引用下面的从他的研究和实际维护适度意向说:“虽然有几种形式的实际意向说,我捍卫形式称为温和实际意向说,它认为的正确解读艺术作品与作者的真实意图兼容,必须支持自己的艺术品。卡罗尔能够为适度的实际意向性辩护，反对偏离作者实际解释的假设意向性。假设意向性是建立在一般范畴假设和最常见假设的基础上的，但适度的实际意向性与作者试图把解释传递给读者的内容是一致的。点由卡罗尔与这篇文章的观点,读者可以解释它假设或者以一种温和的方式,在两方面解释读者会改变因为解释它的能力也随时间变化和发展或恶化。
美国论文被怀疑代写：作家书写的动机
Writers write books and articles with a motivation which makes them write in the way they have written the piece. The same writer who writes his or her biography is a different person when he or she writes a different piece, indicating that the same writer can have different zones of moods under which the motivation rises for writing an original piece. Kingston has written a biography which describes the orthodox feeling of Chinese American people and how they have a general but very rigid concept about a female’s right of expressing her desire for sex and actually having sex with a stranger, as seen in the case of Kingston aunt. The writing is clearer, describes the scene thoroughly with each snapshot of the scene when the villagers find out that the child in Kingston’s aunt is not of her husband but of a stranger, and considering it as a sin run towards her house to punish her and throws several stones on the house. The scene described here has a deep rooting with the authors own idea of the formation of a conception about the dominant thought of female about sex outside marriage and her right of expression. However, when the author herself will look into the same writing of her own biography, she will have become a different person, learned new conceptions and unlearned some conceptions.
美国论文被怀疑代写：作家书写的动机
This contention leads to the inference that the biography once written was when the author was in a specific state of mind, and when writing different texts she was in a different state of mind; thus if we use the biography to judge the other texts of the same author, it may deviate the readers from the exact interpretation which the author is trying to impart. Carroll quotes the following from his research and defends modest actual intentionalism:“Although there are several forms of actual intentionalism, I defend the form known as modest actual intentionalism, which holds that the correct interpretation of an artwork is compatible with the author’s actual intention, which itself must be supported by the artwork.”Carroll has been able to defend modest actual intentionalism against hypothetical intentionalism which is deviating from the author’s actual interpretation. Hypothetical intentionalism is based on the foundations of assumptions of general category and of those which are most common, but modest actual intentionalism aligns well with what the author is trying to transfer the interpretation to the reader. The point made by Carroll fits well with the argument of this essay that the reader can either interpret it hypothetically or actually in a modest way, and in both ways the interpretation the reader will change because the ability to interpret it right also changes and grows or deteriorates with time.
