美国论文代写：三底线对企业和社会有好处吗？
美国论文代写：三底线对企业和社会有好处吗？
发展负责任的企业文化不是一件容易的事。有许多商人和股东认为，企业的唯一目的就是为股东创造财富。美国著名经济学家和统计学家密尔顿弗里德曼认为，企业的唯一责任，向股东。
在他的著作<<资本主义与自由’中，他写道，企业是为了赚钱而经营，而利润的一部分是对投资于他们的股东的一种利润。当企业开始关注自己的社区会导致极权主义。许多经济学家和商人都赞同这一学说的弗里德曼。这些公司很慢地意识到，与股东、环境、雇员、消费者、城市和国家、政府、供应商、企业伙伴、工会、甚至竞争对手都是他们的决定和政策的利益相关者。经营一家公司或一个组织影响每个人的长期影响。1998，在琼斯和波利特零售商滥用权力，把质量以及狭隘的近视使几快钱公司（起重机和螯，2004）。大企业有很多中小供应商，形成他们的供应链。中小企业的这些供应商在某种程度上绕过了他们对社会和环境的责任。最像耐克，阿迪达斯，麦当劳的大公司，苹果和其他人一直用“谁想确保小供应商的大企业分享人类和地球的责任压力集团（佩茨，1998；斯彭斯，1999；Sarbutts，2003）。
美国论文代写：三底线对企业和社会有好处吗？
Developing a culture of responsible business is not easy. There are many businessmen and shareholders who believe that the sole purpose of business is to create money for its shareholders. Noted American economist and statistician Milton Friedman believed that the only responsibilities the businesses have, is towards their shareholders.
In his book ‘Capitalism and Freedom’ he writes that businesses are run to make profit and a slice of that profit is for the shareholders who invested in them. When businesses start concerning themselves with community – it leads to totalitarianism. Many economists and businessmen subscribe to this Doctrine of Friedman.
The companies were slow to realise that with shareholders – environment, employees, consumers, citizens of the city and country, government, suppliers, business associates, trade unions and even competitors are the stakeholders of their decisions and policies. The long term ramifications of running a company or an organization affect everyone. In 1998, retailers at Jones and Pollitt abused their powers and brought down the quality as well as the company by their narrow sightedness of making a few quick bucks (Crane and Matten, 2004).
Big businesses have many small and medium suppliers that form their supply chain. These suppliers from Small and Medium scale Enterprises somehow bypass their responsibilities towards society and environment. Most of the big companies like Nike, Adidas , McDonald’s, Apple and others have been panned by pressure groups of vigilantes who want to ensure that small suppliers of big giant corporations share the responsibilities of people and planet (Petts, 1998; Spence, 1999; Sarbutts, 2003).
