美国论文代写：麦迪逊与美国宪法

美国论文代写：麦迪逊与美国宪法

麦迪逊的论文联邦党人10号是历史上意义重大,因为麦迪逊后来继续强调的问题引起国家间的争端的解释基本人权(在奴隶制问题上)和欧盟之间的关系和权力上的联盟决定的问题(美国内战)。同样重要的是，麦迪逊对美利坚共和国的想法最终在内战中赢得了联邦军队的胜利，而美利坚合众国在200年的时间里并没有受到任何国家的侵略。(1998年)《华盛顿的燃烧》，白宫历史第1 – 6页。

麦迪逊说大共和国促进预防既得利益接管的联盟,情绪经常反映在国情咨文讲话中,美国总统的美国地址国家不仅对于联邦政府的愿景和成就,还概述了国际事件的政策,重申欧盟的力量给其公民的主权的基础上从殖民利益争取自由。麦迪逊认为，在一个大的共和国里，如联邦主义者所设想的那样，“你会有更大的多样性……”兴趣;你使它不太可能成为大多数人……将有共同的动机侵犯其他公民的权利……

麦迪逊认为绝对多数对国家利益有害的观点，在林肯废除奴隶制度的内战的停滞中进一步建立起来。在这种情况下，联盟主张废除，而南方联盟(也称为反联邦主义者)则决定维持现状。根据麦迪逊的声明，在一个大的共和国中，特殊利益倾向于最终平衡彼此，而不是内战的高潮，根据历史学家熟知的联邦主义研究。

美国论文代写：麦迪逊与美国宪法

Madison’s paper The Federalist No. 10 is historically significant because the problems highlighted by Madison would later go on to cause a dispute between states over the interpretation of basic human rights (on the issue of slavery) and that of the relation between the Union and the Confederacy on the authority to decide the issues (The American Civil War). It is also significant that Madison’s idea of a united republic eventually gained ground with the triumph of the Union forces in the civil war, and the United States of America has not been invaded by any nation in 200 years[ Pitch, A. S., (1998), “The Burning of Washington”, White House History pp.1-6].
Madison had remarked that large republics facilitated the prevention of vested interests from taking over the order of the Union, a sentiment that is often reflected in the State of the Union address, in which the President of the United States of America addresses the nation not only regarding the visions and achievements of the Union government, but also outlines the international affair policies, reaffirming the strength of the Union in giving its citizens the sovereignty that was the base of their struggle for freedom from colonial interests. Madison argued, that in a large republic such as the one visualized by the Federalists, “you take in a greater variety of . . . interests; you make it less probable that a majority . . . will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens . . . .”
Madison’s visions that an absolute majority is detrimental to the interests of the nation were further founded in the stagnation of the Civil War when President Lincoln abolished slavery. In this case, the Union advocated abolishment, while the Confederacy (also called the anti-Federalists) resolved to maintain the status quo. Madison’s statement that in a large republic, the special interests tend to eventually balance one another out is not how the Civil War culminated, according to historians well-versed in Federalist studies.