代写毕业论文

美国论文代写:亚马逊的股东理论

美国论文代写:亚马逊的股东理论

亚马逊的战略是,在网络和线下领域中,以极其微小的优势和肆无忌惮的冒险,将其转变为利维坦,但这一切都是由这些自动装置和功能分散的观察者所带来的损失所带来的。近年来,股东们一直在抱怨贝佐斯的创业精神,而不是他们的利益。然而,从长远来看,他们需要弥补所有的东西,因为他们的外表可能需要尽快的得到弥补(肯尼迪,2013)。

近年来,一些投资者一直反对不断上涨的收购成本,尽管他们的预算产品让该组织看起来更像是一家初创企业,而不是一个商业先锋。事实上,即使亚马逊的收购价格已经下降,但目前亚马逊的盈利成本比它的“正常”聚会高出6倍多。这两种假设和经验都表明,这种高度不同的推荐,以至于股票被夸大了,因为投机者愿意为未来的亚马逊利润支付比Ebay和Netflix等比较机构更高的价格。

亚马逊员工的另一个主要问题是亚马逊员工出人意料地解雇员工。最近,亚马逊以一种惊人的方式脱颖而出,成为了真正有新闻价值的人:它付钱给员工,以减少员工的规模。亚马逊承认,接受这个提议的员工在任何情况下都不应该在公司工作。由于公司的发展,大多数员工都反对公司。这影响了员工的生产力和效率水平。因此,该公司在运营方面的整体效率已有所下降。

美国论文代写:亚马逊的股东理论

Amazon’s strategy of following razor-slight edges and unbridled venture into more online and offline domains has helped transform it into the leviathan that it is, however the expense of every one of those automatons and feature diversion observer locales includes. Shareholders have been whining about Bezos’ start-up ethos of development over benefits throughout recent years, however they’ve endured it. In the long run, however, they’ll need the offset to be tipped for how everything adds up, and by the looks of it they may need it as soon as possible (Kennedy, 2013).

In the recent years some investors have stood against at the always rising offer cost, in spite of budgetary products that make the organization look more like a startup than a business pioneer. Indeed, even with the late drop in offer value, Amazon’s cost to profit proportion is presently more than six times higher than its associate gathering normal. Both hypothesis and experience say that such a high different recommend, to the point that the stock is exaggerated, as speculators are willing to pay considerably more today for the guarantee future Amazon profit than for comparative organizations like Ebay or Netflix.

Another major issue faced by the one of the prominent shareholders of Amazon, employees, is the unexpected firing of employees by Amazon. Amazon has stood out as truly newsworthy as of late for an astonishing approach: it pays its workers to quit, so as to reduce the size of its employees. Amazon accepts that a employee who takes the offer ought not be at the organization in any case. By is movement of the company, most of the employees stood against the company. This affected the productivity and efficiency level of the employees in a bad manner. As a result of this, the company’s overall efficiency in operations has been deteriorated.