The use of undue influence has helped a lot in the establishment of a just and efficacious framework in order to reduce the vulnerability among individuals and enhancing certainty among them. However, there are some cases in which undue influence is misused as well. Following are the cases in which Undue Influence is commonly utilized among countries like United States, England and China (especially in Hong Kong);
Dispossessing a child: Necessities that are aberrant, cutting off from any generous estates, involves the regular protests of the decedent’s abundance. At the point when a mother or father takes hands off the children, which is excluding the kids, an unnatural demonstration clearly shows undue influence.
Opposing decedent’s previous estate plan: Dispositions at variation with the decedent’s aims, communicated before the record’s execution. In the event that a decedent had a past Will or Trust that treated his kids in the same way, yet another will, amendment or trust repudiates the previous one, this can make up the conclusion that the decedent was influenced in an undue manner.
Deprived physical and mental state: A testator whose physical and mental state is such as to allow a subversion of to have his own freedom of will; and if there exists proof the testator had a debilitated state of mind it is simpler to show the pressure of another individual has conquered the testator’s will thus imposing the case of undue influence.
Abrupt Depressing Shift in attitude: Under the law of Hong Kong, courts may conjecture that the sudden depressing swing in attitude towards its relatives can be originated by extermination of mind and it could also lead to the emerging of undue influence among relatives.
Olden times mental shortfalls: A will creator with a past full of mental deficiencies adjoins the bottom line that the testator can be influenced in an unduly manner by means of having these deficiencies.