美国水牛城论文代写 ：劳动收入水平

美国水牛城论文代写 ：劳动收入水平

有效性是用劳动收入水平来确定的。这些数据有三年的收入水平：2005年，2006年和2009年。自从美国经济衰退开始于2007年，2005年和2006年的收入代表了劳动力在经济衰退前的收入，而收入2009年代表了2007年和2008年职工岗位培训的收入。典型培训项目的目标是加强国家就业。这里值得注意的是，由于经济衰退，以前可用于相对较少学历的人员的工作已经不再可用了。所以，培训的预期效果是在美国市场有一个类似于经济衰退前的工作场景。如果这个条件得到满足，劳动力市场上会有更多的机会。转移工作会导致收入增加。因此，培训计划的效率是根据三年劳动力收入的变化来确定的。为了捕捉衰退前的劳动收入，2005年和2006年的收入被平均化，使经济衰退前的收入成为2005年和2006年收入的平均值。培训后收入以2009年的收入来表示。分析中的因变量是培训计划的有效性。这种有效性有两种方式。第一种方法是一个三元响应变量，如果收入岗位培训相对于衰退前的时间段有所增加，则值为1，如果完全没有变化，则为0;如果收入在训练。效率的第二个衡量标准是收入变化的分数。

美国水牛城论文代写 ：劳动收入水平

The effectiveness has been determined using the income levels of the labor. The data has the income levels of the labors for three years: 2005, 2006 and 2009. Since the recession in the US started in 2007, the income in the years 2005 and 2006 represent the income of the labor pre-recession whereas the income in the year 2009 represents the income of the workers post training which were given in the years 2007 and 2008. Since the objective of a typical training program is to enhance the employment of the country. It is worth noting here that due to recession, jobs which were previously available to a relatively less-lettered person were not available to them anymore. So, the expected impact of the training was to have a job scenario in the US market which was akin to one pre-recession. If this condition were satisfied, the labors will have more opportunities in the market. Shifting jobs then should lead to an increase in the income. Hence, the efficiency of the training program has been determined using the change in the income of the labors in the three years. To capture the income of the labor in the pre-recession period, the incomes of the years 2005 and 2006 have been averaged out so that the pre-recession income becomes the average of the income in the years 2005 and 2006. The post-training income is represented by the income of the year 2009. The dependent variable in the analysis is the effectiveness of the training program. This effectiveness is derived in two ways. The first method is a ternary response variable having the value 1 if there has been an increase in the income post training with respect to the pre-recession time period, 0 if there is no change at all and -1 if the income has declined after training. The second measure of effectiveness is the fractional amount of change in the income.