利用这些又窄又浅的大梁，这座桥似乎要垮掉了。有了这些类型的薄巷道梁的支持，横跨大桥的桥面似乎是不适当的刚性和一个容易的运动，通过风。这座桥因其迅速增加的移动而很快受到欢迎。一股温和的气流使整个中央跨度交替出现两半，在4秒到5秒的时间间隔内，可以看到几英尺的落差和上升幅度。在施工期间，工人和建筑商都有这种灵活性的经验(Arioli and Gazzola, 2013)。这最终导致一些工人将这座桥称为“疾驰的格蒂”。更常见的情况是，工程师必须处理一些情况，这些情况最终需要考虑大量的伦理问题。更常见的情况是，工程师们面临着许多道德困境。风的振荡最终摧毁了这座崭新的悬索桥。悬索桥的建立是为了对抗风的影响，随着扭曲的正常化而屈服(Arioli and Gazzola, 2013)。
The utilization of these narrow and shallow girders appeared to undo the bridge. With these types of thin roadway girders of support, the deck across the bridge seemed to be inappropriately rigidly and an easy movement was made through the winds. The bridge soon gained popularity for its increased movement immediately. A modest flow of wind had been causing alternate halves throughout the central span for visible falling and rising a number of feet within the interval of four seconds to five seconds. There was experience of this flexibility by the workmen and the builders in the duration of construction (Arioli and Gazzola, 2013). This ended up leading some workers for terming the bridge “Galloping Gertie”. More often, engineers have to deal with situations that end up meriting immense considerations of ethics. More often, engineers have been facing a number of ethical dilemmas. Wind oscillations end up destroying the brand new bridge of suspension. Bridges of suspension had been established as a way of countering the effects of wind, succumbed with normalizing the deviance (Arioli and Gazzola, 2013).
This involves gradually accepted sequential minor failures and errors, culminating and accumulating as a significant catastrophe. A number of professionals are swayed in terms of monetary encouragements, when considering any specific situation. As in this particular scenario, there is no intention of money for persuading someone in support of politics, while having a specific effect over certain scenarios. Engineers are considered paramount to the welfare, health and safety of the public. If the judgment of engineers is overrules in scenarios endangering property or life, notification must be provided to the client or the employer, and any such appropriate authority (Billington, 2006). Engineers require approval for documents of engineering that conform as per the standards appropriately applicable. Engineers should not be revealing information, data or facts in the absence of previous consent of the employer or the client, with the exemption of required or authorized code or law. Engineers are not provided with the permission of using the associate or name in the construction work with any project or person while engaging in dishonest or fraudulent enterprise.