美国代写：自由主义

美国代写：自由主义

自由主义是一个特定于文化的概念吗?因此，自由主义在被称为文化特定的时候是正确的，因为没有其他的力量或意识形态被应用在大众身上，因为文化源于宗教，也许，它限制了个人的选择，破坏了人的意志。文化形成了一套自由的喜好，人们愿意追随它，因为它是自由的，不伤害任何人，并寻求把人类带向平等，如果不把它们限制在一种行为和生活方式。相比之下，自由主义又不是一种特定于文化的概念，它的前提是，自由主义本身是一种发明，只有在看到对自由意志的某种限制时，它才会被视为一种发明，但它并不排除它之前存在的可能性，即使没有文化。文化与遵循特定教条的宗教规则的有知觉的存在联系在一起，更大程度上是由于他们愿意与宗教或地区的文化联系在一起(Moore and Kymlicka, 1992)。

美国代写：自由主义

这本身就使自由主义成为一种重新发现，而不是发明，因为任何刚被发现的东西，当它的需要被认为是极端的时候，即使在需要这样的概念和意识形态之前，也总能有它永恒的存在。自由主义本来是可以存在的，但它从来没有真正地探索过，直到有了它的需要，才把它带到一个人的知识中去。因此自由主义也可以认为是一个个人的概念,而不是与文化的影响,它的事实反驳了其发明的基础上,提出了只有当需要和可能仍未被发现的没有必要的社会在本质上是自由的,没有限制的自由意志。自由主义是一个独立的概念，适用于所有的意识形态，包括政治、宗教、社会、文化、逻辑和推理，使其具有多样性，而不局限于特定文化的外壳。

美国代写：自由主义

Is Liberalism a Culture-specific concept?Thus, liberalism is correct when being called as culture-specific because there is no other force or ideologies which is applied on masses as culture originated from religion, which perhaps, puts restrictions on the individual choices and destroys the will of man to be himself. Culture forms a set of liberal favourites which man willingly follows because of it being liberal and not harming anyone, and seeking to take humanity towards equality, if not restricting them to one way of behaving and living. In contrasts, liberalism again is not a culture-specific concept from the premise that liberalism, per se, is an invention only when there was seen some kind of restriction on free will, but it does not rule out its prior existence even when there was not culture. Culture is associated with sentient beings who follow specific dogmatic religious rules, and are more driven by their willingness to associate with a religion or a region’s culture (Moore and Kymlicka, 1992).

美国代写：自由主义
This itself makes liberalism a rediscovery and not an invention, because anything which is just discovered when its need felt is utmost can always have its eternal existence even before there was a need for such a concept and ideology. Liberalism could have been in existence but was never really inquired enough to bring it to one’s knowledge until there was a need for it. Hence liberalism can also be said to be an individual concept and not associated with an influence of culture, from the fact that it disproves its invention on the basis that it was brought forward only when it was needed and could have still remained undiscovered of there was no need for society to be liberal in nature and there were no restrictions on free will. Liberalism is an individual concept and is applicable to all ideologies, including political, religious, social, cultural, and logic and reasoning, making it diverse in tis reach and not confined to the shells of being culture-specific.