美国代写论文：不公平交易

美国代写论文：不公平交易

不合情理的交易可以被描述为不合情理地使用优越的地位损害另一方遭受残疾或者当该方处于不利的地位时。因此，这种交易是在某种情况或条件下发生时，一方与另一方相比处于特殊劣势，而另一方则处于不公平或不合理的优势。在这方面需要建立几个要素。特殊的残疾不仅仅是不平等，而且涉及到判断力受损。同样，利用涉及残疾知识，程序性或实质性的不合情理。另一方应该因不合情理的行为而签订合同。
高盛法院在Blomley诉Ryan案中做出的判决确定了“不合情理”的概念，并且由于高等法院对“澳大利亚商业银行诉Amadio案”的判决而得到加强。因此，根据一般原则，由于某种条件或情况，一方当事人处于特殊劣势，另一方已经采取不公平或不合理的优势时，由于这种特殊的不利条件而产生的机会，在这种情况下案件中，由于不合情理的行为，交易可以由法院撤销。

美国代写论文：不公平交易
本案的事实与澳大利亚商业银行v Amadio的事实相似。在这种情况下，70多岁的意大利夫妇也被儿子和银行经理要求为他们的儿子执行担保。然而，银行经理有充分的理由相信，儿子对他的业务的偿付能力向他的父母撒谎，他也知道父母的经历很少，他们在理解英语方面存在问题。

美国代写论文：不公平交易

An unconscionable dealing can be described as the unconscientiously using superior position to the detriment of the other party suffering from a disability or when the party is in anexceptional position of disadvantage. Therefore, such dealing takes place when as a result of some circumstance or condition, one party has been placed at a special disadvantage as compared to the other party and the other party takes an unfair or unconscientious advantage. There are several elements that need to be established in this regard. The special disability is not a mere inequality but it involves impaired judgment. Similarly, taking advantage involves the knowledge of disability, procedural or substantive unconscionability. The other party should have entered into the contract as a result of the unconscionable conduct.
The notion of “unconscionability” was firmly established by the decision of the High Court given in Blomley v Ryan and it was strengthened by the decision of the High Court given in the case titled ‘Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio’. Therefore, according to the general principle, when, asa result of some condition or circumstances, one party is under a special disadvantage and an unfair or unconscientious advantage has been takenby the other party, of the opportunity created by such special disadvantage, in such a case, the transaction can be set aside by the court due to unconscionable conduct.

美国代写论文：不公平交易
The facts of the present case are similar to the facts of Commercial bank of Australia v Amadio. In this case also, an Italian couple in their 70s was asked by their son and bank manager to execute a guarantee for their son. However the bank manager had strong reasons to believe that the son had lied to his parents regarding the solvency of his business and he also knew that the parents had very little business experience and they had problems in understanding English language.