ps代写：“禁言法”存在的问题
ps代写：“禁言法”存在的问题
“禁言法”将使人们很难揭露虐待动物或他们的安全问题。该法案的主要目的似乎是防止人们揭露动物暴行。因此，该法案将惩罚在工厂化农场揭露虐待动物或食品安全标准的个人。这些法律将成为公共卫生、动物福利和环境方面的障碍。此外，该法律将阻止个人和当局揭露包括强迫同类相食和将病牛及其产品送往社会食用在内的案件(拉斯穆森，C。,2012)。因此，由于缺乏任何照片或视频证据，人们可能会发现为动物的福利而斗争是极其困难的。刑事法庭在宣布判决时将证据作为主要来源。因此，在没有任何物证的情况下，法院可能无法在与该事项有关的法律程序中确认任何特定的立场。
因此，可以得出结论，“Ag插科打诨法”不符合社会及其成员的最大利益。这项法律将对在征得农场主同意的情况下拍摄照片的观众施加不必要的压力。此外，农场主可以接受或拒绝来访者的请求。因此，偏见可能在社会中蔓延，导致社会成员之间的过度歧视(莱因哈特，R。,2015)。此外，歧视可能为暴力和个人的反对铺平道路，导致抗议和起义的爆发。为了解决现存的问题并提供可行的解决方案，建议将有动物的农田纳入公私伙伴关系。在这种形式的创业中，私营农场主和政府当局将拥有平等的权利。双方可以共同重新审视现有的农场和动物法，并作出相应的修订，以造福社会更大的群体。
ps代写：“禁言法”存在的问题
“Ag gag laws” would make it difficult for people to expose animal cruelty or their safety issues. The primary intent of the bill appears to prevent people from exposing animal brutalities. Thus, the bill would punish individuals exposing animal abuse or food safety standards on factory farms. Such laws would act as an obstacle in the path of public health, animal welfare and environment. In addition, the law would prevent individuals and authorities from uncovering cases including forced cannibalism and sending of sick cattle and their products for consumption in the society (Rasmussen, C., 2012). Thus, people might find it extremely difficult to fight for the welfare of animals due to absence of any photographic or video evidence. The criminal court rates evidence as the primary source in announcement of their verdict. Thus, in absence of any material evidence, the court may not be in a position to affirm any particular stance in legal proceedings related to the matter.
It can therefore be concluded that “Ag gag laws” is not in the best interest of the society and its members. The law would create unnecessary imposition on viewers for capturing images with the consent of the farm owner. In addition, the farm owner may accept or decline request received from visitors. Thus, biasness may creep in society and result in undue discrimination among society members (Rinehart, R., 2015). Furthermore, discrimination may pave way for violence and opposition from individuals resulting in outbreak of protests and revolts. In order to combat the existing problems and offer feasible solutions, it is recommended that farm lands with animals should come under public-private partnerships. In this form of entrepreneurship, private farm owners and government authorities would have equal rights. Both the parties can collectively re-look at existing farm and animal laws and make amendments accordingly for the benefit of larger section of the society.
