assignment代写

写简历的技巧-政治和外交关系的重要性

写简历的技巧-政治和外交关系的重要性

第四则新闻标题为“中国在南海问题上的分歧愈演愈烈”,足以说明在报道新闻时,政治和外交关系非常重要。《经济学人》的这篇报道批评了中国的干预,却没有分析中国所扮演的确切角色(《经济学人》,2015)。相比之下,《中国日报》则耐心地从各个方面进行了报道,并给出了干预的理由。不同之处在于,《经济学人》对这一消息采取了批评的态度,并因此批评了中国,但《中国日报》持中立态度。这两篇报道的相似之处在于,他们用来报道新闻的背景是相同的。第五的消息也明显是“400000人搬到北京郊区”在《中国日报》的关注方面“重大进展”,2017年成立政府的长期愿景,而《经济学人》没有给出任何解释新闻,公开模棱两可的事实(新华社,2015)。这条新闻发表在《经济学人》上,细节很少,没有人能理解北京郊区人口迁移背后的实际议程(《经济学人》,2015)。仔细观察这两个新闻,我们发现,不同点在于相关性。
这对整个世界来说都不是什么新闻,因此,《经济学人》并没有过多强调这一点,只是发表了一段关于它的文章。《中国日报》用事实和数字解释了整个新闻。这些新闻的相似之处在于,它们都提到了其中的含义。第6个例子来自《经济学人》,该杂志发表了一篇关于中国公司阿里巴巴的新文章。新闻的标题是“光棍节:光秃秃的、挥霍无度的,一场网络消费狂欢的准备工作正在进行中”。他们报告称,这与中国领导人鼓励消费者增加支出的观点有关。然而,《中国日报》的标题却是“阿里巴巴在光棍节12小时内创造了90亿美元的销售记录”。他们报告了阿里巴巴的盈利情况,以及它可能给中国经济带来的好处。因此,《经济学人》从一个非常不同的角度进行了报道,没有提到任何与公司利润相关的内容。因此,不同点在于对新闻的看法和报道的意图。《中国日报》的目的是评价公司和经济增长,而《经济学人》的目的是批判性地报道领导者的观点。

写简历的技巧-政治和外交关系的重要性

The fourth news that has been published as title “Disagreement over the South China Sea worsen as China digs in” is enough to claim that political and diplomatic relations matter a lot while covering news. This coverage by The Economist has criticized China’s intervention without analysing the exact role played by China (The Economist, 2015). In contrast to that China Daily has patiently covered all the aspects with reasons of interventions. The point of difference here is that The Economist acted critically with respect to this news and criticized China for this but China daily has presented a neutral point of view. The similarity between both the reporting is that the background they have used to report the news is common. The fifth news that is also noticeable is “400,000 people to move to suburbs of Beijing “in China daily has focused on the aspect of “substantial progress” by 2017 and established the government’s long term vision, whereas The Economist did not give any explanation for this news and it made public ambiguous about the facts (Xinhua, 2015). This news was published in The Economist with meagre details that nobody can understand the actual agenda behind shifting of the people to suburbs on Beijing (The Economist, 2015). On observing both news carefully, it has been observed that the point of difference is relevance.
It is not relevant news for the whole world and thus, The Economist has not stressed much on it and just published a paragraph about it. China daily has explained the whole news with facts and figures. The point of similarity between these news is that they have mentioned the implications.The sixth example is from The Economist that has published a new about China’s company Alibaba. The headline of the news reads “Singles day: Bare and profligate, Preparations are under way for an orgy of online spending”. They have reported it with connection to Chinese leaders’ perspectives of encouraging the consumers to spend more. Whereas, China daily’s headline reads “Alibaba breaks record with $9b sales in 12 hours on Singles’ Day”. They have reported it with respect to the profits that Alibaba has made and the benefits that it could fetch to Economy of the country. Thus, the economist reported it with a very different perspective and nowhere mentioned anything related to the company’s profits. Thus, the point of difference is views towards the news and intentions of reporting. The intention of China Daily is to appraise the company and economic growth whereas the intention of The Economist is to critically cover the perspectives of leaders.

以上是美国高阶论文AdvancedThesis网提供。如果你觉得本文还不够详尽,可以再看看本站其它相关文章,或许对你有用。另外,如果需要美国代写论文,就点击上方栏目列表,各种服务等着你,客服24小时在线,欢迎咨询!