研究论文代写：欧洲共同体对关税的讨论

研究论文代写：欧洲共同体对关税的讨论。整个欧洲共同体除了对《科托努协定》的承诺外，没有任何有力的辩护。欧共体认为，遵守《科托努协定》是它们的道义责任，它们以两个实体商定的价格从非加太国家进口金枪鱼产品是完全合理的。在特惠关税因素出现之前，这一点是相当清楚的，也是无可争辩的。接下来研究论文代写专家将为同学们分享下有关欧洲共同体对关税的讨论。

欧盟对所有来自泰国的金枪鱼产品征收24%的进口关税，但对ACP国家不征收。这显然和无疑是有争议的和歧视性的。公平待遇对一个实体来说是不公平的，对其他实体来说是不公平的，如果没有正当理由拒绝接受低标准的产品。

然而，欧共体确实承认泰国和菲律宾表示的关切，但它们不愿就其声明进行辩护并对泰国关于歧视行为的指控作出答复。欧共体有义务遵守《科托努协定》中规定的规则和关税条例。需要指出的是，欧共体代表了许多国家，这些国家有不同的要求和不同的财政状况，这最终导致征收关税的混乱状态。然而，由于ACP国家出售廉价的金枪鱼，而且出口成本低于从泰国进口，欧共体只好对从泰国进口的金枪鱼征收关税。欧共体有权降低其贸易成本，因为它有理由同意其合作伙伴，而泰国无权干涉。有一个歧视问题使欧共体的理由有点薄弱。

The EC imposed 24% import tariff on all tuna products coming from Thailand, but not on the ACP countries. This was clearly and undoubtedly disputable and discriminatory. Fair treatment is with one entity and unfair with other when there is no legitimate reason for rejection of products for their low standards.

The EC did, however, acknowledge the concerns expressed by Thailand and the Philippines but they were hesitant to come to the table for defending their statement and answering Thailand’s allegation of discriminatory behaviour. The EC was under obligation to adhere to the rules and tariff regulations laid out in the Cotonou Agreement. It is to be noted that the EC represents many countries who have different requirements and different financial health, which culminates into a confused state of tariff imposition. However, since the ACP nations sold cheap tuna and the cost of export was low than coming from Thailand, the EC resorted to imposing tariff on tuna imported from Thailand. EC has the right to reduce its cost of trade as it justifiably agrees with its partners, in which Thailand has no right of interference. There is a discrimination question which makes the EC’s case a little weaker.

以上内容就是欧洲共同体对关税的讨论。如果同学们在撰写研究论文时需要更多的帮助，请随时在线咨询美国论文代写服务或发送电子邮件联系我们。美国论文代写帮助专家可以24×7全天候为您提供帮助，除此之外，还有同学们提供paper代写、essay代写、report代写等论文服务，而且代写论文价格公平合理，保证论文原创，并使用权威的抄袭检测系统，让同学们松应对论文写作并创作出专属个人的优秀论文!