芝加哥论文代写：儒家思想、道教和佛教

芝加哥论文代写：儒家思想、道教和佛教

道教地址的西方文化和道德缺陷可能需要放弃信仰区分正确和错误的,道德价值观,惩罚和道德推理的重要性。另一方面,正如上面提到的,儒家思想往往是面向过去的,而不是面向现在或将来。类似佛教的方式强调消除不满,这可能发生在过去。进一步在道教,因此没有太多的规则大致给出了有快乐的生活方式。儒教和佛教给实现公义的方式铺设原则和语句。最后的规则、原则和语句可能约束人类,最终可能无法达到的目的是什么但是考虑道教发展和实现而练习简单的事情。这是说佛教的人控制而在儒家思想原则是有界的。道教是免费的从这些方面。这就是为什么领导实践中采用的道教一直也已经被采用和实施(克雷格,2000)。佛教的道路上需要一个启蒙运动是永恒的,但生命是进化的本质在儒教和道教。道教更合理的原则不施加限制或限制性的实践,因为它一直在研究儒家思想。

芝加哥论文代写：儒家思想、道教和佛教

Taoism addresses ethical shortcomings of western culture and may need to abandon their belief to make distinction between the right and the wrong, moral values, punishment and importance of moral reasoning. On the other hand, as mentioned above, Confucianism tends to be past oriented rather than present or future oriented. Similarly Buddhism in a way stresses on removing dissatisfaction that may have occurred in past. Further there are not much rules in Taoism and thus broadly gives the way to have happy life. Confucianism and Buddhism give the way to achieve righteousness by laying principles and statements. Lastly the rules, principles and statements may constraint the human and ultimately may not be able to achieve what is intended however considering Taoism the things are evolved and achieved while practicing simple things. This is to say that in case of Buddhism one has to control whereas in Confucianism is bounded by the principles. Taoism is free from such aspects.  This is the reason why the Taoism has been adopted in leadership practices as well and has been well adopted and implemented (Craig, 2000). Buddhism takes one on the path of enlightenment which is quite eternal but essence of life is to evolve which is there in both Confucianism and Taoism. Taoism is more justifiable as its principles do not impose restrictions or restrictive practices as it has been studied in Confucianism.