留学 论文代写：总统竞选

在： ,

留学 论文代写：总统竞选

总统竞选的基础是奴隶制问题，以及他对前政党项目的支持。这些计划的重点是内部改善和保护关税。林肯在他的第一次竞选中没有成功。在他的第二次尝试中，他没有发表任何演讲，只是依靠密切关注竞选活动。此外，工人们关注的是党的纲领，然后是林肯的生活故事。其目的是为了展示自由劳动的力量和潜力，不仅是为了那些能够达到顶峰的劳动者，而且是为了社会的利益。因此，自由劳动的消极方面林肯的无能和固执的本性被反对的人所强调。
考虑到他与新闻界的关系，可以说许多纸媒机构的存在是他面临的最大挑战。然而，林肯确保他与某些选定的报纸保持联系。林肯针对的三个方面是渗透，拉拢和收买。在渗透中，他为辉格党的报纸写匿名文章，宣传他的朋友，贬低对手(Randall 1953)。在他的买断策略中，他帮助费城新闻报的编辑在华盛顿建立了《星期日早晨纪事报》。因此他得到了报纸的支持。在有关增选的战略中，他通过支持《老兵报》创办了自己的报纸。他还支持德国报纸《伊利诺斯州订书机》。发展与媒体的关系是他竞选总统的一部分。

留学 论文代写：总统竞选

The campaigns for the presidency were based on slavery issue and his support for programs of his former party. These programs focused on internal improvements and protective tariff. Lincoln did not succeed in his first campaign. In his second attempt, he gave no speeches but relied on just monitoring the campaign closely. Further, the workers focused on party platform and then on the life story of Lincoln. The target was to demonstrate the power of free labor and the potential, and it had not only for the labor who could reach the top, but also on the benefits to the society. Thus, the negative aspects of free labor and inability or stubborn nature of Lincoln that was being highlighted by opposition was countered.
Considering his relations with press, it can be said that the presence of many paper bureaus was the biggest challenge to combat. However, Lincoln ensured that he maintained relations with certain selected newspapers. The three aspects that Lincoln targeted was infiltration, co-opting and buying off. In infiltration, he wrote anonymous articles for Whig papers for the promotion of his friends and belittles the rivals (Randall 1953). In his buying off strategy, he helped editor of Philadelphia Press newspaper in establishing the Sunday Morning Chronicle in Washington. Thus he got support from the newspaper. In his strategy related to co-opt, he started his own newspaper by backing the newspaper ‘The Old Soldier’. He also supported the German newspaper `The Illinois Staats-Anzeiger’. Developing relationship with press was part of his campaign for the presidential elections.

美国 代写：缺乏适当的沟通和关系管理会导致什么问题

在： ,

美国 代写：缺乏适当的沟通和关系管理会导致什么问题

缺乏适当的沟通和关系管理将导致几个问题。Rufin和Rivera-Santos(2012)分析说，为了使组织达到目标，它们应该能够解决一些无形的问题以及与这种情况有关的有形问题。PPP必须有一个不仅仅基于政府支持的治理体系。应该制定替代计划或建议来处理复杂的联盟。在这一过程中，应更加重视以信任为基础的治理。缺乏这种信任是主要问题。Winch(2014)指出，在PPP的情况下，重要的因素是利益相关者对竞争问题的了解、管理层对增长的承诺和沟通。除此之外，商业、资源和治理之间应该存在接口和内聚操作。应该开发临时更新的范例或启发式来解决永久性组织的问题，从而为每个组织开发预期的输出(Winch, 2014)。
Nissen, Evald和Clarke(2014)选择了三个PPP项目来了解PPP面临的挑战。研究发现，计划和愿景的同质性问题导致了伙伴关系中不同逻辑和目标的发展。事实上，这个群体内部存在着多样性。研究发现，将利益相关者的意识形态和观点整合在一起的公司能够发展出更具协作性和合作性的互动(Opawole and Jagboro, 2016)。发现了更多的创新过程。这些异质团队能够开发一个共同的知识库，并受到外部事件的积极挑战，这些外部事件有助于他们的创新和生产力。进行了一项研究，以解释PPP所涉及的代理成本。重点是在项目执行期间存在的组织形式和固有的不确定性。在这个案例中，我们的假设是动态道德风险环境(Iossa和Martimort, 2012)。

美国 代写：缺乏适当的沟通和关系管理会导致什么问题

Lack of a proper communication and relationship management would lead to several issues. Rufín and Rivera-Santos (2012) analysed that for the organizations to meet objectives, they should be able to address some of the intangibles as well as the tangibles involved in the situation. It is important for the PPP to have a governance system that is not only based on the government for support. There should be development of alternative plans or proposals in place to deal with the complex alliances. There should be more importance given to the trust-based governance in this process. Lack of this trust is the main issue. Winch (2014) stated that in the case of PPP, the important factors are stakeholder knowledge about the issues in contention, management commitment towards growth and communication. Apart from this, there should be interface and cohesive operation that should exist between the commercial, resourcing and governance. There should be temporarily newer paradigms or heuristics that should be developed to address issues of permanent organizations to develop the intended output for each organization (Winch, 2014).
Nissen, Evald and Clarke (2014) had chosen three PPP projects to understand about the challenges of the PPP. It was found that the issue of a homogenous plan and vision lead to developing of dissimilar logics and objectives within the partnership. In reality, there is diversity within the group. It was found that the companies that integrate the ideologies and views of the stakeholders were able to develop a more collaborative and cooperative interactions (Opawole and Jagboro, 2016). There was more innovation process that was found. These heterogeneous teams were able to develop a common knowledge base and were positively challenged by the external events that aided in their innovation and productivity. A study was undertaken to decipher about the agency costs involved in a PPP. There was focus given towards organizational forms and innate uncertainty that exists during project implementation. The assumption that was made in this case was the dynamic moral hazard environment (Iossa and Martimort, 2012).

代写：什么是内容分析方法

在： ,

代写：什么是内容分析方法

这些漂白的区域还是只有女性覆盖的琐碎区域?这就是内容分析要回答的问题。内容分析的方法是为了了解新闻内容的形式，而新闻内容的形式确实是男性和女性所采用的。当媒体内容被量化时，孤立的案例有时会被低估(Kolmer, 2008)。这就是为什么我们所做的内容分析也被现有的研究以定性的方式批判性地分析(flying & Swift, 2013)。分析结果显示，这一说法使得女性更多地关注生活方式(不重要的领域)，而男性更多地关注政治和体育。这两个研究问题的目的是了解新闻编辑室中性别的代表(男性和女性记者)是什么，以及男性和女性记者实际报道的领域是什么。对于第一个问题，因此确定新闻编辑室的性别代表是不平等的。在所有被纳入分析的404个故事(所有媒体)中，73%的故事由男性报道，27%由女性报道。
这是不平等的。至少，从收集到的数据样本来看，女性只报道了所有新闻的四分之一，无论是软媒体还是硬媒体。新闻不平等并不是什么新鲜事。事实上，人们普遍认为新闻报道中存在不平等(Alan, 1999)。因此，也可以接受的是，参与表征的人可能也反映了同样的不平等。Alan(1999)的工作主要是关于种族主义的，但由于种族主义涉及到不平等作为一个方面，可以做出类似的推论。女性运动的新闻机构或新闻领域存在偏见(Dickinson, 2010;Ryfe, 2009)。考虑一下North在“Blokey Newsrooms”(North, 2012)中呈现的内容。与同行不同的是，对女记者的研究往往仅限于对她们在新闻编辑室的工作进行快照，而较少涉及她们的经历。

代写：什么是内容分析方法

Now are those bleached out areas or trivial areas only covered by women? This is the answer that the content analysis set out to answer. The content analysis method was carried out in order to understand the form of journalism content that is indeed taken up by men and women. When media content is quantified, it so happens that at times the isolated cases might get underrated (Kolmer, 2008). This is the reason that the content analysis done is also critically analysed in a qualitative way with the existing research studies (Flew & Swift, 2013). The results of the analysis show that the claim made that women report more on lifestyle (unimportant areas) and that men report more on politics and sports. The two research questions aimed at understanding what the representation of gender in the newsroom (male v. female reporters) were and what were the areas men and women journalists were actually reporting in. For the first question, it was hence established that the representation of gender in newsroom was not equal. Of all 404 stories (across all mediums) that were considered for the analysis, around 73% were reported by males, whereas 27% were reported by females.
This is inequality. At least, from the data sample collected, it does appear that women are reporting only a quarter of all news, whether the soft media or the hard media. Now inequality in news is not exactly a new thing. In fact, it is an accepted notion that in news representations there will be inequality (Alan, 1999). Hence, it can also be accepted that the people involved in the representations might also reflect the same inequality. The work of Alan (1999) was mostly on racism, but since racism touches on inequality as one of the aspects, a similar inference can be made. The journalistic institutions or the journalistic sphere in which the women moves is biased (Dickinson, 2010; Ryfe, 2009). Consider what North presented in the “Blokey Newsrooms” (North, 2012). Research about women journalists unlike their counterparts was often restricted to only taking snapshots of their work in newsrooms and less about their experiences.