代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护
代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护
知识产权和专利保护有助于保护创新者的权利，并有助于开发产品独特的销售主张(Shay, 2014)。这是基于适当性因素的概念(Bittlingmayer, 1988)。适宜性因素是指创新者从创新中获利的能力。法律规定的先例通常让公众感到困惑。应该使用正确的原则对其进行上下文化和解释。像Michael Baigent和Richard Leigh v. The Random House Group Limited这样的案例已经改变了历史事实用于小说写作的方式(Shay, 2014)。1893年，家乐氏诉国家饼干公司开创了可以申请专利的先例(Pollack, 1999)。在此基础上，企业根据法律要求制定战略。这样的案例会影响公司未来的战略，也会影响公司未来的决策。每一个案例都需要基于以前的案例和案例的立法进行主观解释。为了进一步分析专利申请方面的问题，本文以Apimed Medical Honey Ltd v Brightwake Ltd[2012]为例进行分析。
代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护
提出了相关的法律和双方的观点。专利法是由1977年的专利法案规定的。人们发现，1949年的《专利法》所作的许多决定仍然具有现实意义。英国也是欧洲专利公约的成员国之一。因此，这些公约下的规则在形成判例时也具有相关性(Waelde et al.， 2013)。专利一般被发现是有领地性的，授予期为20年(Aplin，和Davis, 2013)。可利用性是创新者利用其为经济目的而设计的设计的权利(秋山，和Furukawa, 2009)。它受两个因素控制，即可保护性和可自由操作的条件。保护因素是公司能够维护和保护设计的研发者(秋山，和Furukawa, 2009)的所有权水平。自由经营条款是指公司在不侵犯他人权利的情况下经营的程度。这可以通过正式的方法或非正式的方法来完成(Somaya, 2012)。正式的方法是获取专利。
代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护
Intellectual property Rights and Patenting has helped protect the innovator rights and has aided in the development of the unique selling proposition of the products (Shay, 2014). This is based on the notions of appropriability factor (Bittlingmayer, 1988). Appropriability factor is the ability of the innovator to make profits from their innovation. Precedent set by the laws are generally confusing to the public. It should be contextualized and interpreted using the right principles. Cases like Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh v. The Random House Group Limited has changed the ways in which historical facts can be used for writing of novels (Shay, 2014). In 1893, Kellogg co. V. National Biscuit Co has set the precedent as to what can be patented (Pollack, 1999). Based on this, the firms develop strategy based on the legal requirements. Cases like these affect the future strategies of the firm and also impact the way decisions are made in the future. Each case requires subjective interpretation based on the previous cases and the legislations of the cases. To further analyze the aspects of patenting, the case of Apimed Medical Honey Ltd v Brightwake Ltd [2012] has been used in this analysis.
代写assignment：知识产权和专利保护
The relevant laws and the views of both sides of the argument are presented. Patent law is regulated by the Patents Act of 1977. It has been found that many of the decisions made in Patent Act of 1949 continues to hold relevance. UK is also a member of the European Patent convention. Hence, the rules under those conventions also hold relevance whilst forming judgment of the cases (Waelde et al., 2013). Patents are in general found to be territorial and is awarded for a period of 20 years (Aplin, and Davis, 2013). Appropriability is the right of the innovator to use the design created by them for the purpose of economics (Akiyama, and Furukawa, 2009). It is governed by two factors they are protectability and Free to Operate conditions. Protectability factor is the level of ownership that a company can maintain and protect the R&D of the design from the innovators (Akiyama, and Furukawa, 2009). Free to operate clause is the degree by which a company can operate without infringing on the rights others. This can be done through formalized methods or informal methods (Somaya, 2012). Formalized methods are procuring patents.
