代写毕业论文

加拿大论文代写:数据研究对比

加拿大论文代写:数据研究对比

Erasmus et al(2010)的文章对卫生保健环境中是否遵守和不遵守手部卫生的相关性进行了评估。在ICU的一些HCW医院、一些工业化国家的其他普通病房和外科病房中,大约有96项关于手部卫生的实证研究。本研究是一项定量研究,并进行了文献综述。两名研究人员进行了筛选、数据提取的过程。使用Microsoft数据库输入数据。本研究的重点是两位研究者,他们通过使用中位数数据收集来保证数据的准确性和减少偏差,以确保发现的准确性。本研究的局限性在于由于方法论上的巨大差异,无法进行meta分析。对结果进行比较和解释的过程是艰难的。Cusini等(2015)的文章对在接触预防措施中使用的强制手套去除之前和之后的手部卫生情况进行了评估。

加拿大论文代写:数据研究对比

为了开展这项研究,2009年约有32名患者接受了治疗,并采取了预防措施,2012年有44名患者接受了治疗。进行了定量研究。这是在非随机观察表中完成的首先在2009年12月,然后在2012年4月至6月。通过使用标准化问卷,对患者在接触预防和医院设置方面的观察依从性。这项研究的优势在于,通过使用标准化的HH工具进行观察,并考虑到所有HH遵从性,世卫组织可以系统地提出这一建议。不同的观察员接受了观察过程的训练。为了第一次影响修改的接触预防可能导致使用消除手套对HH合规。这些限制应该包括,在意识到被观察到之前,HCP的表现可能不同。由于取消强制手套后HH的符合性较高,可能会因为政策的变化而被使用。

加拿大论文代写:数据研究对比

The article by Erasmus et al (2010) does the assessment of the relevance the correlation of the compliance and non-compliance with hand hygiene in the healthcare setting. Around 96 empirical studies had been carried out for the compliance with hand hygiene among some of the HCW’s in ICU, other general and surgical wards in some of the industrialized nations. The research was a quantitative research and a literature review had been given. The process of screening, data extraction had been done by two researchers. Microsoft database had been used to enter data. The strength of the research is two researchers who ensured accuracy of data and reducing bias by the use of the median data collection in order to assure the accuracy of the finding. The limitation of the research is that the Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the huge number of methodological different. The process of comparing and interpretation of the results was tough. The article by Cusini et al (2015) does the assessment of the hand hygiene compliance before and after the removal of the mandatory glove to be used during the contact precautions.

加拿大论文代写:数据研究对比
In order to carry the research around 32 patients had been accessed who were on precaution in the year 2009 and 44 patients were precaution were used in 2012. The quantitative research has been carried out. This has been done in a nonrandomized observation form first in December 2009 and later on in April-June in 2012. The observational compliance for the patients on contact precautions and in hospital setting has been done by the use of a standardized questionnaire. The strength of the research is that by the use of the standardized HH tool for the observations by considering all the HH compliance it can be suggested by WHO in a systematic manner. The different observers have been trained for the process of observation. In order to be the very first impact of modified contact precautions may lead to the use of a eliminatory glove use on HH Compliance. The limitations should include that the HCP’s may behave in a different manner before they were aware of being observed. As a result of the higher compliance of HH after the elimination of the mandatory glove, it may be used because of the changes in policy.