论文代写:纳什均衡

论文代写:纳什均衡

然而,如果一个卖家想要开始销售牙膏在更高的价格,客户不想购买这个价格所以他必须改变策略,这就是为什么纳什均衡不会有效的价格将会降低。这就是为什么纳什均衡经济学是极其重要的,尤其是在市场,因为它帮助客户以及生产商做出正确的选择。
经济学的概念ofNash平衡几乎是无用的
根据麦克亚当斯,协调博弈的纳什均衡,双方会做出类似的决策来获得最大的利润或效益。然而,它不是很真实,因为它是一个信念,如果一家公司推销自己的产品,其他人也应该这样做,如果他们不那么他们的销售会下降,他们将处于劣势。但这并不总是真的证明协调博弈纳什均衡可以是错误的(麦克亚当斯,2009)。
2013年,乔被任命为世界顶级商店。尽管所有其他商店做很多营销、销售额乔从未标榜自己,但仍然非常高。这意味着,即使一个公司不按照其他公司仍然可以成功。所有公司推销他们的产品,但乔并没有和它仍然是成功的。这意味着,即使没有纳什均衡,可以做出正确的决定。
乔已经表明,如果一个公司只遵循自己的决定,不受他人的影响,它仍然可以受益很多。它作用于直观的行为,它已经非常成功,如果一个人是通过直觉所以他也可以进步不是纳什均衡的情况。纳什均衡有一方面提供了一个好的平台来做决定。但另一方面,它一直在经济学无用的非常糟糕。

 

论文代写:纳什均衡

However, if a seller wants to start selling toothpaste at higher price while the customers do not want to buy it at that price so he will have to change his strategies which is why Nash equilibrium would not be effective as the price would be lowered. This is why Nash equilibrium is extremely important in economics, especially in the market place as it helps the customers as well as the producers in making the right choice.

Economics with the Concept ofNash Equilibrium Is Practically Useless

According to the McAdams, in the coordination game of Nash equilibrium, both the parties have to make similar decisions to get the maximum profits or benefits. However, it is not very true as it is a belief that if one firm is marketing its products, the others should do it too and if they don’t so their sales would decline and they would be at a disadvantage. But this is not always true proving that the coordination game and Nash equilibrium can be wrong (McAdams, 2009).

In 2013, Trader Joe was named the top store of the world. Although, all the other stores do a lot of marketing, trader Joe has never marketed itself but still its sales are extremely high. This means that even if a company does not follow what the other companies are following it can still be successful. All companies market their products but Trader Joe doesn’t and it is still successful. This means that even without Nash equilibrium, right decisions can be made.

Trader Joe has shown that if a firm only follows its own decisions and it does not get influenced by others, it can still benefit a lot. It works on intuitional behaviour and it has been extremely successful and if a person works through intuition so he can also progress well which would not be the case with Nash Equilibrium. Nash Equilibrium has on one hand provided a good platform to make decisions. But on the other, it has been making economics useless which is extremely bad.