美国留学论文代写：浅析娜塔莎的批判
美国留学论文代写：浅析娜塔莎的批判
经过娜塔莎对侯赛尼小说的批判，可以推断出她已经完全读过这部小说，已经完成了写作和以前的小说，他写的“追风筝的人”的风格分析。她指出了一些非常突出的问题，理解，思想和阿富汗生活的方式。作者的写作风格和作者所触及到的各种话题也都涉及到了批评。批判是一种描述性的批判中，女性主义作家娜塔莎有一个倾斜的支持对妇女，因为她对狂欢主要对女性的条件，如Hosseini在小说。虽然这部小说的中心人物是两位女士的困境娜塔莎指出，有许多问题也在小说中如塔利班和苏联之间的战争，并迫使阿富汗加入mujahiddeen男性青少年的行为。妇女被迫戴面纱，他们称之为“布卡”。在阿富汗教育机构匮乏，蔑视其他宗教和哲学的几个问题，包括。除了这些，像社会的仇恨一个私生子的问题，对癫痫的人可在小说中也有描述。娜塔莎可以触摸和阐述了所有这些问题多一点。她描述了Hosseini的写作风格，以及她对。可以看出，她把这部小说与作家的其他小说作了比较，这一点是可以理解的。总之，批评似乎是一个详细的分析小说，娜塔莎已经阐述了更多的内容，而不是挑战作家的想法。
美国留学论文代写：浅析娜塔莎的批判
After going through the critique of Natasha on Hosseini’s Novel, one can infer that she has completely read the novel and have done the analysis of the Hosseini’s style of writing and the earlier Novel written by him like “The Kite Runner”. She has pointed out some of the very prominent issues, understandings, thoughts and the way of Afghan life. The writing style of writer and the various topics the writer has touched have also been covered in the critique. The critique is a descriptive critique in which the feminist writer Natasha has an inclined support towards women, because her critique revels majorly the condition on women, as shown by Hosseini in his novel. Although the central characters of the Novel are the two ladies whose plight Natasha has highlighted, there are numerous issues also described in the novel such as the war between Taliban and Soviets, and the act of forcing male adolescents of Afghanistan to join Mujahiddeen. Women were forced to wear veil which they call “burka”. Scarcity of educational institutions in Afghanistan, disdaining other religion and philosophies are a few topics that are covered. In addition to these, issues like society’s hatred towards an illegitimate offspring, untouchability towards an epileptic person are also described in the novel. Natasha could have touched and elaborated all these issues little more. She has described the writing style of Hosseini as well in her critique. This can be figured out by seeing the fact that she has compared the current novel with the other novel of the writer. All in all, the critique seems to be a detailed analysis of the novel, and Natasha has elaborated more about the content, instead of challenging the ideas of the writer.
