美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革

美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革

越南利用大量的资源来改革宪法和法律，支撑“社会主义市场经济”。这些过程的进行通常是临时性的，没有什么与战略和经验证据相关的证据显示系统用户需要什么。这导致了一系列法律和司法领域，其中一些机构和法律看起来很脆弱，与商业实践毫无关系。越南与官僚机构有关的部门正在继续运作，几乎不受法治和问责制原则的阻碍，这一原则一直给刚刚起步的商业界带来巨大问题。这就是越南“政治”，“行政”，“司法”，“法律”等相关定义的提出，需要修改和完善与“社会主义法治国家”有关的观念从单纯的修辞到现实。这也是为了抓住商机和社会提供的机会（Soo and Wong，2012）。

美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革
在菲律宾，宪法是在1987年制定的，体现了支持意识形态联盟推翻马科斯并使科拉松·阿基诺上台的议程。其宪法的政治纲领是通过选举机构来恢复民主，并通过自由的宪法维护人民的权利。菲律宾的经济计划正在为穷人提供管理私有财产的自然统治措施在社会正义标题和保护主义品牌（Shepherd＆Wilson 2008）的民族主义下防止对外贸易和工业的控制。这些想法反复地将在未来二十年中被背叛。

美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革

Vietnam has used a significant number of resources to reform its constitution and laws in underpinning the “socialist-oriented market economy”. The proceeding of the processes has often been ad hoc with little evidence related to the strategy and empirical evidences what is needed by the users of the system. This results in a universe of legal and judicial where a number of agencies and laws looks vulnerable with little relevance to the practice of business. There have been Vietnamese sectors related to the bureaucracy that is continuing its operations almost unhindered by the rule of law and accountability principles that has been causing tremendous problems for the fledging business community. This is suggesting of the definitions related to the “political”, “administrative”, “judicial” and “legal”in Vietnam with a need to revise and refine in transforming the idea related to the“socialist rule of law state” from a mere rhetoric to reality. This is also telling the allowance of the businessman and the society at large in seizing the opportunity it provides (Soo and Wong 2012).

美国密苏里大学论文代写：宪法改革
In Philippines, the constitution was framed in 1987, embodying the agenda that supports ideological coalition ousting the Marcos and bringing Corazon Aquino to power. The political program of its constitution was restoring the democracy with the elective bodies and preserving the rights of its people through a constitution that is liberal in nature.The economic program of Philipinnes was ministering the poor with measures of statist in nature that regulates the private property the prevent the foreign control over trade and industry under the social justice rubric and the nationalism of the protectionist brand (Shepherd & Wilson 2008). These ideas, repeatedly, will be betrayed over the next twenty years.