美国论文代写-采矿投资中的资源暴利税。资源暴利税是一种税率为40%的暴利税，它将引导澳大利亚利用非再生资源。由于基本上是可偿还的，对矿区使用费单位的信贷往往是跨地区偿还的，也将包括在内。政府考虑设计这个方案，因为从这个特定的方案可以获得预期的某些好处(Asadi, 2008)。该计划在最初的执行阶段建立了30亿美元的计划税收，最终在2013年至2014年期间达到了90亿美元(Stewart, 2014)。此外，普通民众也获得了这些矿业公司在生产最终产品时享受价格下降的能力。此外，就业率最终随着生产率的进一步增加而增加(Hanan, 2009)。这项计划的结果是，对采矿的投资增加了4.5%，进一步减少了采矿部门内大型组织的寡头垄断行为。此外，小型企业组织也获得了在整个行业中发展整体业务的能力。论文范文美国论文代写-采矿投资中的资源暴利税分享给留学生阅读。
The resource super profits tax develops a rate of tax of 40 percent levying upon super profits that will lead out of the utilization of non- renewable resources across Australia. Being essentially refundable, a credit for units of royalties mining tend to be recompensing across areas will also be in inclusion. The government considered designing this scheme due to certain benefits as expected from this particular scheme (Asadi, 2008). The scheme had been established for the production of revenue out of projecting tax at 3 billion dollars in the initial period of execution that ended up reaching 9 billion dollars between the period of 2013 and 2014 (Stewart, 2014). In addition, the general public managed to gain the ability of enjoying decreased value of price for the production of final products by those companies of mining. In addition, the rate of employment ended up increasing with further increment in the rate of production (Hanan, 2009). As a result of this scheme, there has been an increase in investment in mining by 4.5 percent, further reducing the behaviour of oligopoly delivered by large size organizations within the mining sector. Also small business organizations considerably gained the ability of growing the overall business across the industry.
As the overall scheme of RSPT had been designed in order to protect the interest of public, key explanation can be provided using the public interest theory can be used and applied in a significant manner (Lutfi, 2007). Hence, it can be stated that for providing the best explanation to the position of the authorities of government, public interest can be considered.