美国代写essay：企业竞争力
美国代写essay：企业竞争力
现在的关注点是那些正在提供像美国大多数公司这样的物质工具的公司。在这种情况下，信息在创新过程中起着重要的作用。一些国家寻找其他国家无法获得的信息。通过使用这种信息，市场发现了差距，假设是建立在传统观念上的。这是大多数聪明和相信创新，研究和发展的公司和国家所使用的技巧（Siggel，2006）。
各国的情况和条件在整个公司的能力发展中起着至关重要的作用。公司组织，管理和结构的方式是基于这样一个事实：国家的情况如何发生。以中等规模，短距离，大规模的成功企业为例，可以看到这一点。在意大利，这种情况是存在的，因为家庭财富存在于国内，人们拥有从祖先继承的财富。这种情况在德国是相反的，因为这些公司是分层次的，管理实践和政策是根据这个技术背景（Brender和Spencer，2005）。
美国代写essay：企业竞争力
缺乏历史维度
波特模型中没有历史意义，钻石模型被认为只是一个抽象的后发展理论的历史维度的模型。这个理论也没有关注国家文化和呈现国家作用的低估（Brander and Krugman，2003）。搬运工模式中缺少国家的作用，不关注国家竞争力。
美国代写essay：企业竞争力
The attention now is towards the companies that are giving material tools like most of the US companies. In this context information is playing an important role during the process of innovation. Some nations look for the information that is not available to other nations. By using this information market gaps are discovered and assumptions are build on conventional wisdom. This is a trick used by most of the companies and nations that are smart and believe in innovation, research and development (Siggel, 2006).
Circumstances and conditions of the countries play a vital role in the development of competencies throughout the companies. The way companies are organized, managed and given structure is based on the fact that how circumstances of the country are taking place. Example of this can be observed in the example of successful companies that are medium range, short range and big sized, they are owned by the families. This situation is present in Italy because the wealth of family is present in the country and people have wealth that they inherited from their ancestors. This situation is reversed in Germany as the companies are hierarchical and management practices and policies are according to this technical background (Brender and Spencer, 2005).
美国代写essay：企业竞争力
Lack of historical dimension
It has been debated that historical significance is not present in the porter model and diamond model has been observed to be a model that presents only abstract about the application of historical dimensions of the late development theory. This theory is also not giving attention about the national cultures and downplays that are presenting the role of the state (Brander and Krugman, 2003). The role of the state is missing in the porter model and is not giving attention about the national competitiveness.
